Hi Chuck—

 

RE: QUESTION: When will the 2020 Census Summary File #1 be released?

 

Census Bureau announced in 2019 that the product formerly known as SF1 would be reduced -- fewer tables, especially fewer crosstabs -- and that the new collection of tables would be called Demographic & Housing Characteristics (DHC).  I have not seen any news lately on what the final set of DHC tables will include. It’s possible that this is *still* unsettled?

 

I am not surprised that you found nothing on census.gov.  Census execs were earlier promising DHC as a product… but then in 2021 they pivoted to: make no promises of anything. They scrubbed mentions of DHC off of census.gov. 

(oh. But they didn’t get everything… https://www2.census.gov/about/partners/cac/nac/meetings/2021-05/presentation-2020-census-data-products.pdf )

 

WHEN will we see the DHC product? was asked by journalists at the August 12 webcast press conference – and Census spokespeople would not answer the question.

 

Hopefully we get DHC product sometime in 2022. Earlier than 2022 seems unlikely because DAS/Differential Privacy processing is going to add multiple months.

 

But I would be guessing. Again, If someone has actual intel, point us there!

 

--TG

 

 

Metropolitan Council Logo

Todd Graham

Principal Forecaster  |  Research

Metropolitan Council

390 North Roberrt Street, St. Paul, MN 55101

Ph. 651-602-1322 

metrocouncil.org | facebook | twitter

 

 

From: Charles Purvis <clpurvis@att.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 1:31 PM
To: The Census Transportation Products Program Community of Practice/Users discussion and news list <ctpp@listserv.transportation.org>
Subject: [CTPP News] Re: Defining PUMAs for Census 2020

 

Todd: 

 

The pro-tips on building PUMAs (discourage splitting counties; encourage consistency with city boundaries) make great sense. 

 

(I’ve had a lot of fun using the POWPUMA data from PUMS. In California we have 58 counties and 41 POWPUMAs. Good for trying to analyze county-to-county commute patterns over the years.)

 

QUESTION: When will the 2020 Census Summary File #1 be released? I can’t find the information on the Census Bureau’s website. My hunch is that it will be about four months after the PL 94-171 data is released, perhaps by December 2021???

 

The SF1 (STF1A to old-timers) will have the detailed “short form” tabulations including: households by household size, detailed age cohort tables; householder tables; detailed hispanic groups; detailed asian groups; owner/renter tenure; etc.

 

Chuck

 



On Aug 23, 2021, at 1:01 PM, Graham, Todd <todd.graham@metc.state.mn.us> wrote:

 

Hi Chuck— 

 

Thanks for the heads-up.  Yes, that is the way to think of PUMAs = as “super-districts” or sub-state regions. 

 

Here are my “pro-tips” learned in PUMA drawing 10 years ago:

  1. Do not group together fractional pieces of counties when you could keep a county whole, or when you could group multiple whole counties together in a PUMA.
  2. When splitting counties into multiple PUMAs, try to arrange for the split lines to be stable city/town boundaries.  This means you’re looking to create PUMAs where city/town boundaries are aligned with Tract boundaries. (Because Census Geog Dept will require that tracts be the basic units of PUMA assembly.)

 

The reason I emphasize parsimony with counties in point #1 is: The PUMAs you draw will enable or limit the detail of MIGPUMAs as well. (MIGPUMA= Migration origination geographic units)  Census Bureau will create MIGPUMAs as the least common denominator grouping of counties that is entirely coincident with a group of PUMAs.  So don’t split counties unnecessarily.

 

The reason I emphasize city/town boundaries in point #2 -- even though Census Geog discusses tracts as the basic units – is this: The PUMAs you draw will enable or limit the detail of POWPUMAs. (POWPUMAs = Place of Work geographic units)  Census Bureau will create POWPUMAs as the least common denominator grouping of counties + places that is entirely coincident with a group of PUMAs. 

Stated differently: Census looks for combinations of county + place to uniquely nest within a POWPUMA.

 

Why is this the standard for POWPUMAs? It’s because of the questions asked on ACS: ACS asks specifically for the county + place of one’s work location.  The PUMA final criteria document  https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/pumas/2020pumas.html  does say all this, but you’d have to read all the way to the last 3 pages of that document to find it.

 

That’s all my advice. Good luck!

 

--Todd Graham