Working at home, or, from, if you prefer, has been growing since 1980, surpassed walking in 1990, transit in 2017, and now carpooling in 2021.  Most of the lesser modes are now in the under one percent category.  At a minimum we should distinguish those who have no other work place than home, as was the typical case up to 2010, and those with a known outside work destination they visit partially on a scheduled or unscheduled basis.  Look at the Pulse and see how effective that can be, or the SIPP, or BLS, or the Federal Reserve – all took shots at it, all different.  All need to know what the reality is, not jus for transportation purposes.  See the ACS table S0802 in which the three main transportation modes are no longer the main modes,  at least replace transit by Work at Home or add Work at Home to the table.   Alan E Pisarski

 

From: Graham, Todd <todd.graham@metc.state.mn.us>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 3:41 PM
To: The Census Transportation Products Program Community of Practice/Users discussion and news list <ctpp@listserv.transportation.org>
Cc: Alan Pisarski <alanpisarski@alanpisarski.com>
Subject: RE: [CTPP News] Re: ACS considering ride hailing services "Isn’t the most critical change a better handling of current work at home ?"

 

Hi Alan—

Like you, I d like to see an ACS question asking: how many days/week does Person N [entirely] work from home?

And how many days/week does Person N commute to a workplace?

 

But… That is *not* among the changes that USCB/ACSO is advancing for consideration, and described in the FRN.

 

You could submit comment this weekend in reply to the FRN.  But…  you’d be asking for an entirely new, additional question.  *More* questions on ACS form is against the grain of what USCB wants to hear – regardless of the proposal being well-intended or needed.

 

In a future cycle… how strong an expression of business need can we muster as transpo agencies? How would we do it? I don’t know. This’s a good question for anyone involved with AASHTO SCOP or CTPP committee? (it’s a decade since I attended SCOP.)

 

Have a good weekend,

Todd Graham

 

 

Metropolitan Council Logo

Todd Graham

Principal Forecaster  |  Research

Metropolitan Council

390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN 55101

Ph. 651-602-1322 

metrocouncil.org | facebook | twitter

 

 

From: Alan Pisarski <alanpisarski@alanpisarski.com>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 12:40 PM
To: The Census Transportation Products Program Community of Practice/Users discussion and news list <ctpp@listserv.transportation.org>
Subject: [CTPP News] Re: ACS considering ride hailing services

 

Ed and all. Isn’t the most critical change a better handling of current work at home ?  Get days of week or  % of days at home?  

From: Ed Christopher <edc@berwyned.com>
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2022 1:36:26 PM
To: CTPP Listserve <ctpp@listserv.transportation.org>
Subject: [CTPP News] ACS considering ride hailing services

 

This may be of interest to some on this list. There is still time to comment on the CB's plans to "include ride-sharing services as a mode of transportation to work" on the ACS questionnaire starting in 2024.

Update from American Community Survey Data Users Group

Federal Register Notice on Proposed Updates to ACS Operations and Question Wording

In September, the Census Bureau posted a Federal Register Notice that invites public comments on some proposed changes to data collection operations and question wording for the 2024 ACS. Comments are due on or before November 14, 2022.

Beginning with the 2024 data collection year, the ACS plans to use administrative records to reduce respondent burden and improve the quality of ACS data. The Census Bureau is focusing initial efforts to supplement or replace ACS survey data for several housing characteristics with administrative data from other sources, such as property tax records. At a minimum, administrative data will be used for the question asking about property acreage beginning in 2024.

In 2024, the ACS plans to add an internet self-response option to the group quarters data collection operation. The Census Bureau believes there is value in offering a self-response option to people living in certain types of group quarters—college/university student housing, group homes, military barracks, workers' group living quarters and Job Corps centers, and emergency and transitional shelters.

Additionally, based on cognitive testing results, the Census Bureau proposes to update wording in the 2024 ACS for questions on three topics: condominium fees, home heating fuel, and journey to work.

  • The condominium fees question would be extended to include homeowners’ association (HOA) fees. Data sources continue to show housing units that are part of HOAs outnumber housing units in condominiums. In order to provide more comprehensive and accurate costs of owning a home, the ACS needs to capture HOA fees for these homes. Adding these fees to the existing condominium fees question avoids adding a new question to the ACS and therefore minimizes respondent burden.
  • The change to the home heating fuel question would update the natural gas and bottled gas categories. This will aid respondents in identifying the correct category more easily by using more commonly used terminology.
  • The journey to work question would be updated to include ride-sharing services as a mode of transportation to work to account for new and growing travel trends. This will reduce ambiguity in the current question about where respondents should report ridesharing commutes and will allow the government to monitor changes in transportation patterns for planning purposes.

For more information and to submit comments: 

 

You were sent this email because an administrator sent it to all users in the Everyone role on American Community Survey Data Users Group.

Here is the link incase it does not come through in the repost from the the ACS Data Users Group. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/09/13/2022-19705/agency-information-collection-activities-submission-to-the-office-of-management-and-budget-omb-for.

 Caution! This email was sent from an external source. Do not click any links or open attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.