CTPP January 2014

ctpp@listserv.transportation.org

24 participants
41 discussions

by Liang.Long.CTR＠dot.gov

Hi, Bob LEHD doesn't have residence information. And I don't think LEHD provides employment data by age and gender either. Liang ________________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] on behalf of Robert Shull [rshull(a)transportmodeler.com] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:42 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Cc: u0719944(a)utah.edu; medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com; tyler.larson(a)utah.edu Subject: Re: [CTPP] female daytime population How would this compare with using LEHD? Thanks, Bob Robert Shull, PE President Eco Resource Management Systems Inc. PO Box 1850 Vashon, WA 98070 206.414.8751 rshull(a)transportmodeler.com<mailto:rshull(a)transportmodeler.com> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:37 AM, <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov<mailto:Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov>> wrote: I didn't manage to send my response last night. I suggest you use the ACS PUMS To run a 4-way cross tab of industry and occupation by age and sex. The geography is limited to residential geography at Puma level. -----Original Message----- From: Long, Liang CTR (FHWA) Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:28 AM Eastern Standard Time To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> Cc: u0719944(a)utah.edu<mailto:u0719944(a)utah.edu>; medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com<mailto:medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com>; tyler.larson(a)utah.edu<mailto:tyler.larson(a)utah.edu> Subject: Re: [CTPP] female daytime population Hi, Steve Your methodology is totally fine with me. I wish we had the cross table of sex by age for workers for both Part 1 and Part 2, so you can get measures of female workers for 40 years up. Liang ________________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net> [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net>] on behalf of Steven Farber [Steven.Farber(a)geog.utah.edu<mailto:Steven.Farber(a)geog.utah.edu>] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:49 PM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> Cc: SEAN CASEY REID; TYLER JOSEPH LARSON; Kevin A Henry (medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com<mailto:medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com>) Subject: [CTPP] female daytime population We are trying to come up with an estimate of adult “daytime” female population for each census tract in Salt Lake City. Intuitively, for a census tract, A, this estimate is: (the number of women who have a workplace in A) plus (the number of women live in A) minus (the number of working women who live in A). >From the 5-year CTPP, we will use tables A20211, A101203, and A11600 for the three terms in the above calculation. We will only calculate the measure for women 16 years and older (although ideally we’d like to have a measure for just 40 years and up). Can anyone from this list provide me with feedback about this methodology? Are there any big issues that I need to be aware of? Is there a better way to be doing this? In the end, we would like a daytime measure of the female population in order to calculate mammography accessibility metrics. Many thanks for your comments. Steve Steven Farber, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Geography University of Utah http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com<http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com/> _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] female daytime population

by Robert Shull

How would this compare with using LEHD? Thanks, Bob *Robert Shull, PE PresidentEco Resource Management Systems Inc.PO Box 1850Vashon, WA 98070206.414.8751 rshull(a)transportmodeler.com <rshull(a)transportmodeler.com>* On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:37 AM, <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov> wrote: > I didn't manage to send my response last night. I suggest you use the > ACS PUMS > To run a 4-way cross tab of industry and occupation by age and sex. The > geography is limited to residential geography at Puma level. > > > -----Original Message----- > *From: *Long, Liang CTR (FHWA) > *Sent: *Friday, January 24, 2014 11:28 AM Eastern Standard Time > *To: *ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > *Cc: *u0719944(a)utah.edu; medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com; tyler.larson(a)utah.edu > *Subject: *Re: [CTPP] female daytime population > > Hi, Steve > > Your methodology is totally fine with me. > > I wish we had the cross table of sex by age for workers for both Part 1 > and Part 2, so you can get measures of female workers for 40 years up. > > Liang > ________________________________________ > From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] on > behalf of Steven Farber [Steven.Farber(a)geog.utah.edu] > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:49 PM > To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > Cc: SEAN CASEY REID; TYLER JOSEPH LARSON; Kevin A Henry ( > medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com) > Subject: [CTPP] female daytime population > > We are trying to come up with an estimate of adult “daytime” female > population for each census tract in Salt Lake City. > > Intuitively, for a census tract, A, this estimate is: (the number of > women who have a workplace in A) plus (the number of women live in A) minus > (the number of working women who live in A). > > >From the 5-year CTPP, we will use tables A20211, A101203, and A11600 for > the three terms in the above calculation. We will only calculate the > measure for women 16 years and older (although ideally we’d like to have a > measure for just 40 years and up). > > Can anyone from this list provide me with feedback about this methodology? > Are there any big issues that I need to be aware of? Is there a better way > to be doing this? > > In the end, we would like a daytime measure of the female population in > order to calculate mammography accessibility metrics. > > Many thanks for your comments. > > Steve > > Steven Farber, PhD > Assistant Professor > Department of Geography > University of Utah > http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com<http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com/> > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > >

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] female daytime population

by Elaine.Murakami＠dot.gov

I didn't manage to send my response last night. I suggest you use the ACS PUMS To run a 4-way cross tab of industry and occupation by age and sex. The geography is limited to residential geography at Puma level. -----Original Message----- From: Long, Liang CTR (FHWA) Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 11:28 AM Eastern Standard Time To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Cc: u0719944(a)utah.edu; medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com; tyler.larson(a)utah.edu Subject: Re: [CTPP] female daytime population Hi, Steve Your methodology is totally fine with me. I wish we had the cross table of sex by age for workers for both Part 1 and Part 2, so you can get measures of female workers for 40 years up. Liang ________________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] on behalf of Steven Farber [Steven.Farber(a)geog.utah.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:49 PM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Cc: SEAN CASEY REID; TYLER JOSEPH LARSON; Kevin A Henry (medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com) Subject: [CTPP] female daytime population We are trying to come up with an estimate of adult “daytime” female population for each census tract in Salt Lake City. Intuitively, for a census tract, A, this estimate is: (the number of women who have a workplace in A) plus (the number of women live in A) minus (the number of working women who live in A). >From the 5-year CTPP, we will use tables A20211, A101203, and A11600 for the three terms in the above calculation. We will only calculate the measure for women 16 years and older (although ideally we’d like to have a measure for just 40 years and up). Can anyone from this list provide me with feedback about this methodology? Are there any big issues that I need to be aware of? Is there a better way to be doing this? In the end, we would like a daytime measure of the female population in order to calculate mammography accessibility metrics. Many thanks for your comments. Steve Steven Farber, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Geography University of Utah http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com<http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com/> _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] female daytime population

by Liang.Long.CTR＠dot.gov

Hi, Steve Your methodology is totally fine with me. I wish we had the cross table of sex by age for workers for both Part 1 and Part 2, so you can get measures of female workers for 40 years up. Liang ________________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] on behalf of Steven Farber [Steven.Farber(a)geog.utah.edu] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 5:49 PM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Cc: SEAN CASEY REID; TYLER JOSEPH LARSON; Kevin A Henry (medicalgeography(a)yahoo.com) Subject: [CTPP] female daytime population We are trying to come up with an estimate of adult “daytime” female population for each census tract in Salt Lake City. Intuitively, for a census tract, A, this estimate is: (the number of women who have a workplace in A) plus (the number of women live in A) minus (the number of working women who live in A). >From the 5-year CTPP, we will use tables A20211, A101203, and A11600 for the three terms in the above calculation. We will only calculate the measure for women 16 years and older (although ideally we’d like to have a measure for just 40 years and up). Can anyone from this list provide me with feedback about this methodology? Are there any big issues that I need to be aware of? Is there a better way to be doing this? In the end, we would like a daytime measure of the female population in order to calculate mammography accessibility metrics. Many thanks for your comments. Steve Steven Farber, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Geography University of Utah http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com<http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com/>

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] female daytime population

by Patricia Becker

I hope you're going to aggregate those tracts into some larger areas, because the margins of error on these estimates are going to be astronomical. Most tracts have fairly low workplace numbers because they are essentially residential and only have local businesses/schools/churches providing employment. Tracts with really large employment counts often have few residents, e.g. airports. Some tracts are low on both, e.g. large parks. It also depends on how good a job the local area has done at tracting and retracting every ten years. Good luck. Patty Becker On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Steven Farber <Steven.Farber(a)geog.utah.edu>wrote: > We are trying to come up with an estimate of adult “daytime” female > population for each census tract in Salt Lake City. > > > > Intuitively, for a census tract, A, this estimate is: (the number of > women who have a workplace in A) plus (the number of women live in A) minus > (the number of working women who live in A). > > > > From the 5-year CTPP, we will use tables A20211, A101203, and A11600 for > the three terms in the above calculation. We will only calculate the > measure for women 16 years and older (although ideally we’d like to have a > measure for just 40 years and up). > > > > Can anyone from this list provide me with feedback about this methodology? > Are there any big issues that I need to be aware of? Is there a better way > to be doing this? > > > > In the end, we would like a daytime measure of the female population in > order to calculate mammography accessibility metrics. > > > > Many thanks for your comments. > > > > Steve > > > > Steven Farber, PhD > > Assistant Professor > > Department of Geography > > University of Utah > > http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > -- Patricia C. (Patty) Becker APB Associates/Southeast Michigan Census Council (SEMCC) 28300 Franklin Rd, Southfield, MI 48034 office: 248-354-6520 home:248-355-2428 pbecker(a)umich.edu

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] FW: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development

by Jami Garrison

For Michigan, contact your regional Census Bureau Office in Chicago: http://www.census.gov/regions/ here in Arizona we are working with the Denver Regional Office to offer workshops. =================================== Jami Garrison Socioeconomic Research Program Manager Maricopa Association of Governments 302 North 1st Avenue, Ste 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 jgarrison(a)azmag.gov<mailto:jgarrison(a)azmag.gov> (602) 254-6300 From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Jane Fitzpatrick Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:29 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] FW: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development How can we get these in Michigan? On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:55 AM, <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov<mailto:Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov>> wrote: FYI From: U.S. Census Field Division [mailto:field.division(a)subscriptions.census.gov<mailto:field.division(a)subscriptions.census.gov>] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:05 AM To: Murakami, Elaine (FHWA) Subject: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development Please Share With Your Contacts and Networks [BF] * Census Data for Businesses Flyer.pdf<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> [https://admin.govdelivery.com/system/images/22705/original/Census%20logo%20…] Questions? Contact Us<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Preferences<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> | Unsubscribe | Help<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> ________________________________ This message has been sent by the U.S. Census Bureau * Washington, DC 20233 [Powered by GovDelivery]<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news -- Jane Jane Fitzpatrick Economic and Community Development Programs Coordinator East Michigan Council of Governments 3144 Davenport Ave. Suite 200 Saginaw, MI. 48602 (989) 797-0800 Be sure to visit us at our website www.emcog,org<http://www.emcog,org>

11 years, 6 months

[CTPP] female daytime population

by Steven Farber

We are trying to come up with an estimate of adult "daytime" female population for each census tract in Salt Lake City. Intuitively, for a census tract, A, this estimate is: (the number of women who have a workplace in A) plus (the number of women live in A) minus (the number of working women who live in A). >From the 5-year CTPP, we will use tables A20211, A101203, and A11600 for the three terms in the above calculation. We will only calculate the measure for women 16 years and older (although ideally we'd like to have a measure for just 40 years and up). Can anyone from this list provide me with feedback about this methodology? Are there any big issues that I need to be aware of? Is there a better way to be doing this? In the end, we would like a daytime measure of the female population in order to calculate mammography accessibility metrics. Many thanks for your comments. Steve Steven Farber, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Geography University of Utah http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com<http://stevenfarber.wordpress.com/>

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] FW: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development

by Elaine.Murakami＠dot.gov

If you are outside of the States listed from the Census Bureau's Los Angeles office, please contact YOUR regional Census office and tell them you are interested to have something similar in your area. http://www.census.gov/regions/ Elaine From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Patricia Becker Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:33 AM To: ctpp Subject: Re: [CTPP] FW: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development Hey, Elaine, this is just for the states in the LA regional office! Patty On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:55 AM, <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov<mailto:Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov>> wrote: FYI From: U.S. Census Field Division [mailto:field.division(a)subscriptions.census.gov<mailto:field.division(a)subscriptions.census.gov>] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:05 AM To: Murakami, Elaine (FHWA) Subject: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development Please Share With Your Contacts and Networks [BF] * Census Data for Businesses Flyer.pdf<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> [https://admin.govdelivery.com/system/images/22705/original/Census%20logo%20…] Questions? Contact Us<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Preferences<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> | Unsubscribe | Help<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> ________________________________ This message has been sent by the U.S. Census Bureau * Washington, DC 20233 [Powered by GovDelivery]<http://links.govdelivery.com/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkPTIw…> _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news -- Patricia C. (Patty) Becker APB Associates/Southeast Michigan Census Council (SEMCC) 28300 Franklin Rd, Southfield, MI 48034 office: 248-354-6520 home:248-355-2428 pbecker(a)umich.edu<mailto:pbecker(a)umich.edu>

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] FW: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development

by Jane Fitzpatrick

How can we get these in Michigan? On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:55 AM, <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov> wrote: > FYI > > > > *From:* U.S. Census Field Division [mailto: > field.division(a)subscriptions.census.gov] > *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:05 AM > *To:* Murakami, Elaine (FHWA) > *Subject:* Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for > Business and Community Development > > > > *Please Share With Your Contacts and Networks* > > > > [image: BF] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Census Data for Businesses Flyer.pdf<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > > Questions? Contact Us<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > > > SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: > Manage Preferences<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > | Unsubscribe | Help<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > ------------------------------ > > This message has been sent by the U.S. Census Bureau · Washington, DC 20233 > > [image: Powered by GovDelivery]<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > -- Jane Jane Fitzpatrick Economic and Community Development Programs Coordinator East Michigan Council of Governments 3144 Davenport Ave. Suite 200 Saginaw, MI. 48602 (989) 797-0800 Be sure to visit us at our website www.emcog,org

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] FW: Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for Business and Community Development

by Patricia Becker

Hey, Elaine, this is just for the states in the LA regional office! Patty On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:55 AM, <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov> wrote: > FYI > > > > *From:* U.S. Census Field Division [mailto: > field.division(a)subscriptions.census.gov] > *Sent:* Thursday, January 23, 2014 8:05 AM > *To:* Murakami, Elaine (FHWA) > *Subject:* Free Census Presentations/Workshops on Business Data for > Business and Community Development > > > > *Please Share With Your Contacts and Networks* > > > > [image: BF] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Census Data for Businesses Flyer.pdf<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > > Questions? Contact Us<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > > > SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: > Manage Preferences<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > | Unsubscribe | Help<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > ------------------------------ > > This message has been sent by the U.S. Census Bureau · Washington, DC 20233 > > [image: Powered by GovDelivery]<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > -- Patricia C. (Patty) Becker APB Associates/Southeast Michigan Census Council (SEMCC) 28300 Franklin Rd, Southfield, MI 48034 office: 248-354-6520 home:248-355-2428 pbecker(a)umich.edu

11 years, 6 months

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

CTPP January 2014