Texas Transportation Institute: Transit Mobility Program has been applying the Census 2010 UA Criteria released on August 24, 2011. We have been assisting the TxDOT Public Transportation Division in their efforts to anticipate the impacts of UA and UC changes.
A co-worker and I have been conducting analysis on specific urban clusters/areas as per TxDOT's needs for anticipating the impact of changes on transit formula funding. I have spoken with some contacts within the Census Geography Department and am confident I have a good grasp of data sources and interpretation of the criteria. However, the analysis we have done has not been via a script or code in GIS. We have been manually applying certain steps of the criteria, such as the changes relating to impervious surface, to augment some recent statewide research we had already completed (we projected 2010 UAs several years ago). I think that Martin Catala at CUTR may have a student now working on a script and code for the criteria. Anyone interested may contact me to discuss TTI's process and findings.
Jonathan Brooks
Assistant Transportation Researcher
Texas Transportation Insitute: Transit Mobility Program
(806) 440-2462 Cell
(713) 686-2971 ext 15106 Office
j-brooks(a)ttimail.tamu.edu
FYI: The final report for NCHRP 08-79 was recently posted on the TRB
website as a Web-Only document, see:
http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/Producing_Transportation_Data_Products_fr
om_the_Am_165976.aspx
Enjoy this important research!
Guy
Guy Rousseau
Surveys & Transportation Model Development Manager
Atlanta Regional Commission
40 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30303
404-463-3274 (work)
678-986-4344 (cell)
grousseau(a)atlantaregional.com <mailto:grousseau(a)atlantaregional.com>
www.atlantaregional.com <http://www.atlantaregional.com>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use
or disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies
of the original message.
As of today, about 150 people have signed up for the October 11 webinar,
so there is still room for you!
This webinar will focus on AFF2. Please use the link below to register
for the session. I have reserved 220 spaces.
https://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/webconference/web_conf_learner_re
g.aspx?webconfid=23454
After you register, you will get the meeting URL and the telephone
number.
Ed Christopher from the FHWA Resource Center Planning Team is
responsible for running the session. His email address is
edc(a)berwyned.com (he prefers using this email address to his official
USDOT email address).
Michelle Jiles on the Census Bureau's ACS staff will conduct the
training. Michelle previously worked for the Census Bureau's
Journey-to-work and Migration Branch, so she is familiar with the CTPP
user community.
I have asked her to cover examples using both tables from ACS and 2010
Census SF 1. She will mention but not provide training on the ACS
system to download files. The Block Group data from ACS is not
available via AFF2 but ONLY through the download system. If there is
time at the end, she can discuss this more fully, or else, we will
arrange for another training session.
We will have plenty of time for questions and answers.
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460 (in Seattle)
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.nethttp://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
Yes, this is the NLCD 2006 data that is being used to qualify urban
territory according to a high degree of impervious land cover. The Census
Bureau will only use the 2001 NLCD in areas where the 2006 vintage is not
available (outside conterminous U.S.). According to the 2010 Census urban
area delineation criteria, a census block qualifies for inclusion in an
initial urban core if it is associated with a high degree of impervious
surface cover and is compact in nature, or shares a significant boundary
with qualifying territory. In order to identify this territory, the Census
Bureau first extracts the NLCD cells with 20% or higher imperviousness.
After a raster to vector transformation on the extracted cells is
performed, the Census Bureau then intersects the polygons with the census
blocks. If more than 1/3 of the area of the census block is impervious,
the block is flagged as a potential impervious block. However, the census
block must then meet the shape index or contiguity criteria in order to
qualify as belonging to the initial urban area core. Please see the
Federal Register notice for a full description of these criteria:
http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/urbanruralclass.html
The Census Bureau allows for the inclusion of non-compact census blocks
because the Census Bureau found in testing a number of elongated census
blocks with a high degree of imperviousness were associated with road
medians that artificially separated qualifying territory. In some cases,
the presence of these census blocks prevented further iterations of the
initial core qualifying criteria effectively disqualifying territory that
should have been considered urban. Thus, as described in the Federal
Register notice, some interactive review is necessary to determine whether
classification of the additional urban territory is appropriate during
these additional iterations of the core building criteria enabled by the
identification of these census blocks.
Christopher J. Henrie
Geographic Standards and Criteria
Geography Division
U.S. Census Bureau
4600 Silver Hill Road
Washington, D.C. 20233-7400
Mail Stop: 7400
Phone: 301-763-9086
Fax: 301-763-4710
From: "Seidensticker, Dan" <DSeidensticker(a)cityofmadison.com>
To: "'ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net'" <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net>
Date: 09/27/2011 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: [CTPP] Are you writing GIS code to estimate Urbanized Area
Boundaries using 2010 Census
Sent by: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net
Not sure if I’ll get the time to do this but I was giving some thought to
it. Does anyone know for certain if this is the NLCD impervious dataset
that is being used in the criteria? http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd06_data.php
The Federal Register doesn’t go into much detail on how the percent
impervious area data is used in the criteria. Is the impervious area
translated to census block geography (raster to vector)? The footnotes in
the register suggest some subjectivity which would could make it difficult
to incorporate into code.
Dan Seidensticker
GIS Specialist
Madison Area Transportation Planning Board:
A Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
City of Madison Planning Division
121 S. Pinckney Street, Suite 400
Madison, WI 53703
Voice: 608-266-9119
Fax: 608-261-9967
Email: dseidensticker(a)cityofmadison.comwww.MadisonAreaMPO.org
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net]
On Behalf Of Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 1:57 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] Are you writing GIS code to estimate Urbanized Area
Boundaries using 2010 Census
I can’t remember who told me they were writing some ArcGIS code to estimate
what the Census Bureau’s new urbanized (50,000+) areas might be, based on
the CB’s Federal Register notice of the final criteria. If you are willing
to share your code, I think that there are others who would be interested
in applying it in their own area.
I checked with the Census Bureau Geography and they said they were NOT
going to share their code.
FHWA decided NOT to attempt this task, as we will just WAIT for the list
and boundaries to be released from the Census Bureau.
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460 (in Seattle)
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.nethttp://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
I can't remember who told me they were writing some ArcGIS code to
estimate what the Census Bureau's new urbanized (50,000+) areas might
be, based on the CB's Federal Register notice of the final criteria. If
you are willing to share your code, I think that there are others who
would be interested in applying it in their own area.
I checked with the Census Bureau Geography and they said they were NOT
going to share their code.
FHWA decided NOT to attempt this task, as we will just WAIT for the list
and boundaries to be released from the Census Bureau.
Elaine Murakami
FHWA Office of Planning
206-220-4460 (in Seattle)
I found this is my email today from an undisclosed source. I would think
that the data will only be released in Factfinder2 but I haven't heard
anything for sure. If anyone on the list is part of the State Data Center
network and knows more please let us know. For now I guess we will just
have to wait and read about it in our newspapers.
---------------
Sept 20, 2011:
Media Webinar: 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates - at 3 p.m.
EDT, the Census Bureau will hold a Web conference to discuss the Sept. 22
release of the 1-year American Community Survey estimates. The webinar
will include guidance on how to access and use the upcoming 1-year
estimates, a review of selected findings and a question and answer
session. The Web conference will consist of a simultaneous audio
conference and online presentation. Dial-in and access information will be
announced closer to the date. Only media with current embargo passwords
may join in. (News release embargoed Sept. 20 for release Sept. 22.)
--
Ed Christopher
FHWA Resource Center Planning Team
4749 Lincoln Mall Drive, Suite 600
Matteson, IL 60443
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (C)
This announcement came from the Census Bureau today. As you can see, it is for "Only members of the media who have applied for and received embargo access may join." Apparently the Census Bureau is not interested in releasing embargoed data to those of us who use it.
The SCD network is apparently allowed to participate in these press releases/discussions/webinars, but not the affiliate network. I have repeatedly stressed that the local media, upon getting something like this, immediately calls us for the local slant. Of course, we have none because we don't have access to the data.
Yes, you will have to wait and read it in your local newspapers or watch it in the local news.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
THURSDAY, SEPT. 15, 2011
Public Information Office CB11-160
301-763-3030/3762 (fax)
e-mail: <pio(a)census.gov>
***CENSUS BUREAU MEDIA ADVISORY***
Census Bureau to Host Pre-Release Web Conference on 2010 American Community Survey Estimates for Embargo Subscribers
What: The Census Bureau will hold a Web conference to discuss the Sept. 22 release of 2010 American Community Survey estimates. The webinar will include guidance on how to access and use the upcoming 1-year estimates, a review of selected findings and a question and answer session.
The Web conference will consist of a simultaneous audio conference and online presentation. Reporters will be able to ask questions once the presentation is complete. After the question and answer session, interested reporters may stay on the line for a demonstration of how to find the estimates in the new American FactFinder system.
When: Tuesday, Sept. 20
Webinar: 3 - 4 p.m. EDT
American FactFinder demonstration: 4 - 4:30 p.m. EDT
Who: This webinar will include a discussion of the estimates that will be released to the public Sept. 22. Only members of the media who have applied for and received embargo access may join. See the Census Bureau's <embargoed releases> page for more information. The embargoed information may not be published or posted on-line until the public release on Sept. 22.
Sharon Stern, assistant division chief, Project Coordination, Communication, and Data User Support, American Community Survey Office
Scott Boggess, chief, American Community Survey Coordination Staff, Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division
Brian McKenzie, analyst, Journey to Work and Migration Statistics Branch
Access: Information on how to access the webinar will be posted in the media embargo area of the Census Bureau website approximately one hour before the start time. Only media with current embargo passwords may access the simultaneous Web and audio presentation.
-X-
Manny Trillo
Manager, Research Data
Mid-America Regional Council
600 Broadway, Suite 200
Kansas City, MO 64105
Phone: 816.701.8220
Fax: 816.427.7758
E-mail: mtrillo(a)marc.org
How does the Kansas City area compare to other peer metros? Check out Metro Outlook, www.metrooutlook.org
-----Original Message-----
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Ed Christopher
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 3:20 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] 2010 1-year ACS due out Sept 22nd.
I found this is my email today from an undisclosed source. I would think
that the data will only be released in Factfinder2 but I haven't heard
anything for sure. If anyone on the list is part of the State Data Center
network and knows more please let us know. For now I guess we will just
have to wait and read about it in our newspapers.
---------------
Sept 20, 2011:
Media Webinar: 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates - at 3 p.m.
EDT, the Census Bureau will hold a Web conference to discuss the Sept. 22
release of the 1-year American Community Survey estimates. The webinar
will include guidance on how to access and use the upcoming 1-year
estimates, a review of selected findings and a question and answer
session. The Web conference will consist of a simultaneous audio
conference and online presentation. Dial-in and access information will be
announced closer to the date. Only media with current embargo passwords
may join in. (News release embargoed Sept. 20 for release Sept. 22.)
--
Ed Christopher
FHWA Resource Center Planning Team
4749 Lincoln Mall Drive, Suite 600
Matteson, IL 60443
708-283-3534 (V)
708-574-8131 (C)
_______________________________________________
ctpp-news mailing list
ctpp-news(a)chrispy.nethttp://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
Hello,
I'm kind of new to this group and don't know if this topic has been covered before or if there are other HPMS folks on this list.
This is a GIS technical question related to the population minimum of 2,500 for urban clusters and the population minimum of 5,000 for HPMS Small Urban Areas.
The TIGER/Line shapefiles for boundaries for Urban Areas will be available in Spring 2012. We plan to use these shapes (after smoothing) to do a GIS "clip" of the roads within them to determine HPMS Data Item #2, Urban_Code.
The HPMS Field Manual says that the Urban_Code value "is 99998 for small urban sections (not within the adjusted urbanized area and with an urban population of at least 5,000)."
So I assume there will be a way to identify the Urban Areas in the shapefile by population so that we can remove those shapes with population between 2,500 and 5,000 before we do our geoprocessing for HPMS. Is this correct?
Thanks!
Denise Hesselroth
HPMS Coordinator, Output/Support Unit
Data Systems & Coordination Section
Mn/DOT Office of Transportation & Data Analysis
395 John Ireland Blvd, MS 450
Saint Paul, Mn 55155
651-366-3852
denise.hesselroth(a)state.mn.us<mailto:denise.hesselroth(a)state.mn.us>