CTPP July 2015

ctpp@listserv.transportation.org

20 participants
13 discussions

Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle

by Polzin

The findings Alan noted have been consistent over time and are always a little disquieting to someone who happens on them and then loses some confidence in the data. I do think folk underestimate the extent to which car loaning goes on in some sociodemographic groups. Part of the reason those millennials don't own cars is because they are still driving mommy or daddy's car. Using extended family member, friends or neighbors vehicles is quite common in many areas. Yes it would be nice if we had data confirmation. Steve Polzin -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Ken.Cervenka(a)dot.gov Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 2:49 PM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle I don't have clear "facts" to share at my fingertips, but this kind of situation occurs in other survey environments as well. I suspect Alan's thoughts are somewhat correct, but it would sure be nice to back this up with examples from personal interview surveys (in-the-field intercepts or CATI approaches) where there was a "logic check" for occurrences where a person indicated they drove alone, but yet they previously answered a "vehicles in the household" question by saying none. So a well-done logic check might at least prompt the interviewer to ask for a clarification. I am, however, not aware of this actually being fielded. -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of ALANPISARSKI Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:51 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle This has been around too long to be explained by car2go or others like it but it may be adding to the numbers. We have often just attributed it to using friends' cars or uncle Harry's. some may interpret the census question which asks about household vehicles available as not pertaining to a company car. Depends how they interpret family or available. We have seen the rise in this and in "Other" with the Census unable to explain it or give greater info for us to interpret. We need a small study of "Other". I have interpreted Other to be, e.g., a school bus driver who brings the bus home-but it's not a household vehicle available. AEP -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Greta Ryan Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:26 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle No, he didn't give any numbers he was just explaining how car sharing works and what someone could use it for. He didn't explicitly say it was happening. You could probably talk with the car share company in Cambridge. I would think they would be interested in your situation. -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:10 AM To: <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle Greta Was Nick Hill able to provide any numbers to back this up? We do have a robust car share network in Cambridge so that could be part of the answer. Cliff Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 23, 2015, at 8:52 AM, "Greta Ryan" <GRyan(a)richmondregional.org> wrote: > > Cliff, > I was just at an ITSVA conference where Nick Hill from Car2Go spoke. Possibly these people use such a service to commute. > > Greta Ryan > > Senior Planner > Richmond Regional Planning District Commission Suite 200 > 9211 Forest Hill Avenue > Richmond VA 23235 > (804) 323-2033 > Richmond Regional TPO > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net > [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:41 AM > To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > Cc: Krause, Henry > Subject: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a > Vehicle > > We are preparing an analysis of the 2006-10 CTPP flow data to support > our transportation planning program. An issue that has come up is that we are seeing a small but noticeable proportion of commuters who state they have 0 vehicles available but whose primary commute mode is driving alone. Aside from the obvious explanation of making a mistake when completing the ACS survey can anyone provide thoughts on how we might explain this anomaly? > > Thanks > > Cliff Cook > > Clifford Cook, Planning Information Manager Cambridge Community Development Department > 344 Broadway, Cambridge, MA. 02139 > > www.cambridgema.gov/CDD > ccook(a)cambridgema.gov > M: 8:30-8:00 T-Th: 8:30-5:00 F: 8:30-Noon > 617/349-4656 > 617/349-4669 FAX > 617/349-4621 TTY > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

8 years, 9 months

Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle

by ALANPISARSKI

This has been around too long to be explained by car2go or others like it but it may be adding to the numbers. We have often just attributed it to using friends' cars or uncle Harry's. some may interpret the census question which asks about household vehicles available as not pertaining to a company car. Depends how they interpret family or available. We have seen the rise in this and in "Other" with the Census unable to explain it or give greater info for us to interpret. We need a small study of "Other". I have interpreted Other to be, e.g., a school bus driver who brings the bus home-but it's not a household vehicle available. AEP -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Greta Ryan Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:26 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle No, he didn't give any numbers he was just explaining how car sharing works and what someone could use it for. He didn't explicitly say it was happening. You could probably talk with the car share company in Cambridge. I would think they would be interested in your situation. -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:10 AM To: <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle Greta Was Nick Hill able to provide any numbers to back this up? We do have a robust car share network in Cambridge so that could be part of the answer. Cliff Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 23, 2015, at 8:52 AM, "Greta Ryan" <GRyan(a)richmondregional.org> wrote: > > Cliff, > I was just at an ITSVA conference where Nick Hill from Car2Go spoke. Possibly these people use such a service to commute. > > Greta Ryan > > Senior Planner > Richmond Regional Planning District Commission Suite 200 > 9211 Forest Hill Avenue > Richmond VA 23235 > (804) 323-2033 > Richmond Regional TPO > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:41 AM > To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > Cc: Krause, Henry > Subject: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle > > We are preparing an analysis of the 2006-10 CTPP flow data to support our transportation planning program. An issue that has come up is that we are seeing a small but noticeable proportion of commuters who state they have 0 vehicles available but whose primary commute mode is driving alone. Aside from the obvious explanation of making a mistake when completing the ACS survey can anyone provide thoughts on how we might explain this anomaly? > > Thanks > > Cliff Cook > > Clifford Cook, Planning Information Manager Cambridge Community Development Department > 344 Broadway, Cambridge, MA. 02139 > > www.cambridgema.gov/CDD > ccook(a)cambridgema.gov > M: 8:30-8:00 T-Th: 8:30-5:00 F: 8:30-Noon > 617/349-4656 > 617/349-4669 FAX > 617/349-4621 TTY > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

8 years, 9 months

[CTPP] Association of Public Data Users (APDU) webinar on Weds, July 29

by Elaine.Murakami＠dot.gov

http://apdu.org/2015/06/18/measuring-america-on-the-move-free-and-accessibl… I have organized a webinar for APDU. There will be 3 topics: 1. Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) -- Penelope Weinberger, AASHTO 2. National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) -- Adella Santos, FHWA and Jasmy Methipara, Macrosys 3. Transportation Secure Data Center (TSDC) -- Jeff Gonder, NREL This webinar is FREE for APDU members, otherwise it is $50 for non-members. FHWA and BTS have long been members of APDU. Hope you will attend! Also, the APDU annual conference is coming up on September 1-2. http://apdu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/APDU_2015_Annual_Conference_Agen… Elaine Murakami FHWA Office of Planning 206-220-4460 (in Seattle)

8 years, 9 months

Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle

by Graham

I've had a suspicion, but I haven't tested it... My suspicion is: Some share of people misunderstand ACS question #32 and decide that "rode to work" does not include the driver. I asked Census Bureau staff last winter... They don't know why. From: Sarah K Heimel (CENSUS/DSSD FED) [mailto:Sarah.K.Heimel(a)census.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 5:33 PM To: Graham, Todd Subject: Re: ACS questionnaire wording Hi Todd, I hope you had an enjoyable holiday. I spoke with the Census subject matter expert on commuting statistics about your question from last month. He said that they are aware of the same anomaly that you and the transportation planners have seen, which has apparently been appearing in the data for a while now, at least since 2000. He thus ruled out my hypothesis of the emerging car-sharing option. In 2006, Census modified the allocation algorithm slightly to jointly assess these two variables when in need of allocation. Still, there seems to be a lot of people who legitimately chose both no vehicles available and drove alone. We are not currently aware of cognitive test results showing an issue with the wording on Question 32. This is on the list of things to research, to hopefully gain insight into who these people are and what the confusion might be. For now though, I unfortunately cannot give you an answer. Best, Sarah Sarah K. Heimel Mathematical Statistician Decennial Statistical Studies Division U.S. Census Bureau 202-384-8548 ________________________________ From: Graham, Todd <todd.graham(a)metc.state.mn.us<mailto:todd.graham(a)metc.state.mn.us>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:21 AM To: Sarah K Heimel (CENSUS/DSSD FED) Subject: ACS questionnaire wording By the way Sarah... is there a team in ACSO that evaluates question wording and quality of response accuracy (or: risk of respondent error)? If so can you forward this on? I was asked earlier this month about commute mode cross-tabbed with "number of vehicles." Transportation planners are asking: how are there so many workers driving to work alone when they live in zero-vehicle households? I speculated: there could be some respondent error accruing to one of the JTW questions? The commute mode questions on the questionnaire are: * #31. How did this person usually get to work LAST WEEK? * #32. How many people, including this person, usually rode to work in the car, truck, or van LAST WEEK? If a respondent perceives a difference between being a passenger vs a driver - and thus "rode to work" vs "drove to work" - then he/she could underreport the number of vehicle occupants by -1. What does ACSO think about respondent error on question #32. Are there high-occupancy carpools that are being misreported as single-occupancy? Let me know if there's any answer - thanks for your attention to this. [EMAILLOGO.png] Todd Graham Principal Forecaster | Metropolitan Council | Regional Policy and Research todd.graham(a)metc.state.mn.us<mailto:todd.graham(a)metc.state.mn.us> P. 651.602.1322 | F. 651.602.1674 390 North Robert Street | St. Paul, MN 55101 | metrocouncil.org/data<http://www.metrocouncil.org/data> [ConWUs][FaceBook_32x32]<http://www.facebook.com/MetropolitanCouncil>[Twitter_32x32]<http://twitter.com/#!/metcouncilnews>[Youtube_32x32]<http://www.youtube.com/user/MetropolitanCouncil> [EmailSU] <https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/MNORGMETC/subscribers/new?preferenc…>

8 years, 9 months

[CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle

by Cook

We are preparing an analysis of the 2006-10 CTPP flow data to support our transportation planning program. An issue that has come up is that we are seeing a small but noticeable proportion of commuters who state they have 0 vehicles available but whose primary commute mode is driving alone. Aside from the obvious explanation of making a mistake when completing the ACS survey can anyone provide thoughts on how we might explain this anomaly? Thanks Cliff Cook Clifford Cook, Planning Information Manager Cambridge Community Development Department 344 Broadway, Cambridge, MA. 02139 www.cambridgema.gov/CDD ccook(a)cambridgema.gov M: 8:30-8:00 T-Th: 8:30-5:00 F: 8:30-Noon 617/349-4656 617/349-4669 FAX 617/349-4621 TTY

8 years, 9 months

Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle

by Mara Kaminowitz

I'm not sure car shares can explain this, because Cambridge (and other cities that use car share a lot) are not unique in this problem. Out of curiosity I pulled out B08141 2011-2013 (Means of Transportation to Work by Vehicles Available) by place. I looked at the percent of all workers who drove alone but who said they have no car. Range 0%-6.8% Median 0.92% Mean 1% Cambridge 1% Boston 1.6% Here are the top 5 with this anomaly. I don't know anything about car share availability in these areas. It would be interesting to see if there is a relationship. Perth Amboy city, New Jersey New Bern city, North Carolina Glen Cove city, New York Middle River CDP, Maryland Daytona Beach city, Florida Mara Kaminowitz, GISP GIS Coordinator ......................................................................... Baltimore Metropolitan Council Offices @ McHenry Row 1500 Whetstone Way Suite 300 Baltimore, MD 21230 410-732-0500 ext. 1030 mkaminowitz(a)baltometro.org www.baltometro.org -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Greta Ryan Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:51 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle Cliff, I was just at an ITSVA conference where Nick Hill from Car2Go spoke. Possibly these people use such a service to commute. Greta Ryan Senior Planner Richmond Regional Planning District Commission Suite 200 9211 Forest Hill Avenue Richmond VA 23235 (804) 323-2033 Richmond Regional TPO -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:41 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Cc: Krause, Henry Subject: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle We are preparing an analysis of the 2006-10 CTPP flow data to support our transportation planning program. An issue that has come up is that we are seeing a small but noticeable proportion of commuters who state they have 0 vehicles available but whose primary commute mode is driving alone. Aside from the obvious explanation of making a mistake when completing the ACS survey can anyone provide thoughts on how we might explain this anomaly? Thanks Cliff Cook Clifford Cook, Planning Information Manager Cambridge Community Development Department 344 Broadway, Cambridge, MA. 02139 www.cambridgema.gov/CDD ccook(a)cambridgema.gov M: 8:30-8:00 T-Th: 8:30-5:00 F: 8:30-Noon 617/349-4656 617/349-4669 FAX 617/349-4621 TTY _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

8 years, 9 months

Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle

by James Garner

But, was it this robust in 2006-2010? James Garner Manager, Research & Analysis Strategic Services Department Pace Suburban Bus 550 West Algonquin Road Arlington Heights, IL 60005 847.228.2307 -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Greta Ryan Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:26 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle No, he didn't give any numbers he was just explaining how car sharing works and what someone could use it for. He didn't explicitly say it was happening. You could probably talk with the car share company in Cambridge. I would think they would be interested in your situation. -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 9:10 AM To: <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> Subject: Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle Greta Was Nick Hill able to provide any numbers to back this up? We do have a robust car share network in Cambridge so that could be part of the answer. Cliff Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 23, 2015, at 8:52 AM, "Greta Ryan" <GRyan(a)richmondregional.org> wrote: > > Cliff, > I was just at an ITSVA conference where Nick Hill from Car2Go spoke. Possibly these people use such a service to commute. > > Greta Ryan > > Senior Planner > Richmond Regional Planning District Commission Suite 200 > 9211 Forest Hill Avenue > Richmond VA 23235 > (804) 323-2033 > Richmond Regional TPO > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:41 AM > To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > Cc: Krause, Henry > Subject: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle > > We are preparing an analysis of the 2006-10 CTPP flow data to support our transportation planning program. An issue that has come up is that we are seeing a small but noticeable proportion of commuters who state they have 0 vehicles available but whose primary commute mode is driving alone. Aside from the obvious explanation of making a mistake when completing the ACS survey can anyone provide thoughts on how we might explain this anomaly? > > Thanks > > Cliff Cook > > Clifford Cook, Planning Information Manager Cambridge Community Development Department > 344 Broadway, Cambridge, MA. 02139 > > www.cambridgema.gov/CDD > ccook(a)cambridgema.gov > M: 8:30-8:00 T-Th: 8:30-5:00 F: 8:30-Noon > 617/349-4656 > 617/349-4669 FAX > 617/349-4621 TTY > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

8 years, 9 months

Re: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle

by Cook

Greta Was Nick Hill able to provide any numbers to back this up? We do have a robust car share network in Cambridge so that could be part of the answer. Cliff Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 23, 2015, at 8:52 AM, "Greta Ryan" <GRyan(a)richmondregional.org> wrote: > > Cliff, > I was just at an ITSVA conference where Nick Hill from Car2Go spoke. Possibly these people use such a service to commute. > > Greta Ryan > > Senior Planner > Richmond Regional Planning District Commission > Suite 200 > 9211 Forest Hill Avenue > Richmond VA 23235 > (804) 323-2033 > Richmond Regional TPO > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Cook, Cliff > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 8:41 AM > To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > Cc: Krause, Henry > Subject: [CTPP] Commuters Who Drive Alone but Do Have Access to a Vehicle > > We are preparing an analysis of the 2006-10 CTPP flow data to support our transportation planning program. An issue that has come up is that we are seeing a small but noticeable proportion of commuters who state they have 0 vehicles available but whose primary commute mode is driving alone. Aside from the obvious explanation of making a mistake when completing the ACS survey can anyone provide thoughts on how we might explain this anomaly? > > Thanks > > Cliff Cook > > Clifford Cook, Planning Information Manager Cambridge Community Development Department > 344 Broadway, Cambridge, MA. 02139 > > www.cambridgema.gov/CDD > ccook(a)cambridgema.gov > M: 8:30-8:00 T-Th: 8:30-5:00 F: 8:30-Noon > 617/349-4656 > 617/349-4669 FAX > 617/349-4621 TTY > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

8 years, 9 months

[CTPP] Fun with LEHD

by Mara Kaminowitz

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2015/07/14/nearly-every-job… http://www.robertmanduca.com/projects/jobs.html *Mara Kaminowitz, GISP*GIS Coordinator ......................................................................... *Baltimore Metropolitan Council* Offices @ McHenry Row 1500 Whetstone Way Suite 300 Baltimore, MD 21230 410-732-0500 ext. 1030 mkaminowitz(a)baltometro.org www.baltometro.org

8 years, 9 months

Re: [CTPP] 1959 Chicago Area Transportation Study : final report in three parts : Chicago Area Transportation Study. : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

by Gorski

http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/67313454.html [cid:image005.jpg(a)01CE2885.CBCD8BD0]<https://www.research.net/s/ZKC9H99> Susan A. Gorski, Section Manager Statewide & Urban Travel Analysis Section Michigan Department of Transportation Van Wagoner Building - B340 425 W. Ottawa Street P.O. Box 30050 Lansing, MI 48909 E-mail: gorskis(a)michigan.gov<blocked::mailto:gorskis(a)michigan.gov> phone: 517-335-2958 cell: 517-243-0734 fax: 517-373-9255 From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Patricia Becker Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:18 AM To: ctpp Subject: Re: [CTPP] 1959 Chicago Area Transportation Study : final report in three parts : Chicago Area Transportation Study. : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive Does anyone have a copy of the Detroit report of the same era? My mother was the field supervisor on that one and it was my first exposure to transportation research! On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:48 AM, ALANPISARSKI <ALANPISARSKI(a)alanpisarski.com<mailto:ALANPISARSKI(a)alanpisarski.com>> wrote: I have all three report originals in a place of pride in my office. Some gems in there. Good to have electronic version, Alan From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net> [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net>] On Behalf Of Krishnan Viswanathan Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:45 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> Subject: [CTPP] 1959 Chicago Area Transportation Study : final report in three parts : Chicago Area Transportation Study. : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive I know some people on this list will find this interesting. https://archive.org/details/chicagoareatrans01chic Enjoy. _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news -- Patricia C. (Patty) Becker APB Associates/Southeast Michigan Census Council (SEMCC) 28300 Franklin Rd, Southfield, MI 48034 office: 248-354-6520 home:248-355-2428 pbecker(a)umich.edu<mailto:pbecker(a)umich.edu>

8 years, 10 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

CTPP July 2015