) Forum but
census bureau types hang out in the 'ACS' topic forum. Might get some
responses over there? The forum is run by the Population Reference Bureau.
On 1/28/2022 3:31 PM, Charles Purvis wrote:
Questions:
*1) Will the Census Bureau be developing and releasing a 2019 (yes,
2019) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) using Experimental Weights?*
I’m not sure this is a simple-to-answer question, but it bears asking.
The Census Bureau released (November 30, 2021) the Year 2020 ACS PUMS
using Experimental Weights. And the iPUMS site just this week
(1/25/22) launched the 2020 ACS PUMS-X on their wonderful/amazing website!
Also on 11/30/21, the Bureau released the 54 tables that will be the
sum total of regular tables on the 2020 ACS. There will be NO 2020
single-year estimates available either on
data.census.gov
<http://data.census.gov> or through the API (application programming
interface, like the R-package tidycensus.) These 54 tables are only
available at the national and state level. Region, county and large
place level data will (apparently) not be released for these 54 tables.
I also read the working paper by Census Bureau staff: "Addressing
Nonresponse Bias in the American Community Survey During the Pandemic
Using Administrative Data*”*
*https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/2021/acs/2021_Rothbaum_01.html*
The Rothbaum working paper goes into incredible detail on the need to
replace the traditional weights used in the ACS with experimental
weights / new weights / “entropy balance weights” / “experimental
entropy balance weights” / ACS experimental weights. The paper shows
a lot of comparisons between older ACS data, typically 2009 to 2019,
and ACS-X data with the experimental weights, for 2019 and 2020. Yes,
the Census Bureau has implemented the experimental weighting procedure
for 2019.
The Bureau is pretty clear about data users NOT comparing the ACS
2005-2019 using the “standard weights” with the ACS 2020 using the
experimental weights. Well, at least that’s their advice/admonition/plea.
Year 2020 data is incomparable. It’s like 61* (Maris) versus 60 (Ruth).
I think we need ACS-X data (ACS with Experimental Weights) for
multiple years in order to make some sense out of this bedlam: 2019,
2020 and 2021. There’s obviously a major time and cost with creating
these data, but it will be worth the investment.
A followup question is:
*2) Will the five-year 2016-2020 data, tentatively scheduled for
release March 20, 2022 (plus or minus weeks?) be weighted using ACS
standard weights? ACS experiment weights? A hybrid?*
I scoured the Census Bureaus’ website, read the transcript from the
11/30/21 webinar, scoured the state data center and ACS data community
websites, and couldn’t find answers.
Help?
Chuck Purvis
_______________________________________________
CTPP mailing list --ctpp(a)listserv.transportation.org
To unsubscribe send an email toctpp-leave(a)listserv.transportation.org