Re: opportunities to express opposition to disclosure rules. Nancy Reger (nreger(a)morpc.org) suggested in February that the Transportation user community prepare a letter to whoever is appointed as the Census Bureau Director. LINK to the CTPP listserv archive: http://www.chrispy.net/pipermail/ctpp-news/ Whether individual MPOs, state DOTs, AMPO, NARC, or AASHTO , or any other organization, want to convey these issues to the CB is UP TO YOU! I will be talking to my FHWA chain-of-command to determine if FHWA (and/or FTA and BTS) will submit an official response from USDOT. And, just to make it clear, since the 2010 Census is a short-form only Census, future CTPP will NOT use the 2010 Census. It will use multiple years of accumulated ACS records. And, after the 2010 Census, the ACS weights should be adjusted to closely match the 2010 Census results. Elaine Murakami elaine.murakami(a)dot.gov Note: please update my contact information. My previous email address will likely expire on March 11. 206-220-4460 ________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Bill Moore Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:24 AM To: 'ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net' Subject: RE: [CTPP] CB Federal Register Notice: ACS 5-year data productsproposal The new Administration's policies seem to be directed towards more openess and transparency with respect to federal information - in many cases completely reversing the more restrictive policies imposed by the previous Administration. Does this pose an opportunity to revive the questions/arguments made by the CTPP users' community in opposition to the disclosure rules promulgated after the 2000 Census? I don't particularly like the notion of more politicization for the Census Bureau, but I like even less (especially as a small metro area) being denied access to transportation planning data that accounts for the uniqueness of individual communities and travel patterns. Perhaps if we again raised this issue starting now, we might get some or all of the less restrictive rules restored before the 2010 Census begins and certainly before the time that a full Census-based CTPP would become available. Do others have any thoughts/opinions about such an approach? Bill Moore, M.ITE, MPO Administrator City of Pueblo - Urban Transportation Planning Division PACOG MPO/TPR 223 N Santa Fe Avenue, Pueblo, CO 81003 Phone: 719-553-2945 FAX: 719-553-2950 E-mail: bmoore(a)pueblo.us <mailto:bmoore(a)pueblo.us> Web: www.PACOG.net <http://www.pacog.net/> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This e-mail transmission (including any attachments) may contain information that is confidential and legally privileged. It is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you received this e-mail in error, please contact us immediately by telephone at 719-553-2951 or by return e-mail, and delete this message from your computer. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net]On Behalf Of Murakami, Elaine Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:38 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: [CTPP] CB Federal Register Notice: ACS 5-year data products proposal Dear Everyone: Today, the Census Bureau issued this Federal Register notice. The 5-year ACS is the first ACS product for small area geography, e.g. census tracts and block groups. I have extracted KEY POINTS that will GREATLY IMPACT data availability for transportation tables and result in a lot of DATA SUPPRESSION at the tract and block group level. As this FR was just issued today, we have not had a chance to estimate the amount of suppression that would occur given these proposed conditions. We are currently working on profile sheets using the 2005-2007 ACS (3-year data) that was released in December 2008. We are finding many tables to be suppressed. So, even with the population threshold of 20,000 for the 3-year ACS data, there is considerable suppression on the current ACS standard table production, at least those tables of key interest to transportation planners. As most of you know, the first CTPP using ACS is a planned 3-year accumulation from ACS 2006-2008. The table list will be re-submitted by AASHTO to the Census Bureau in a few weeks. The next CTPP product is envisioned as a 5-year accumulation from ACS 2006-2010. Because of the many rules the CB has established to protect individual confidentiality not just for the ACS Standard tables, but also for custom tabulations like the CTPP, we believe that the 5-year CTPP for small area tabulation (e.g. TAZs) will need to rely on synthetic data generated inside the CB using the ACS microdata records. _________________________________________________________ *Federal Register Notice: The 5-Year ACS Data Products Release Plan Today the U.S Census Bureau published its data release plan for the ACS 5-year data products in the Federal Register (E9-4803). Beginning in late 2010, the Census Bureau plans to introduce 5-year data products covering the January 2005 through December 2009 data collection period. The release of the 5-year estimates will achieve the goal of the ACS to provide small area data similar to the long-form sample data published after Census 2000. The Census Bureau is proposing to modify its current line of data products to accommodate the 5-year estimates and is requesting comments from current and potential users of ACS data products to help guide this modification. We invite you to review the 5-Year ACS Data Release Plan and provide your response to the contact listed in the Federal Register notice. Please follow this link to the Federal Register notice (PDF files) posted in the Highlights section on the ACS Main page: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/ Comments are due to the contact listed in the Federal Register notice by April 20, 2009 From the Census Bureau's pdf document: 2. Detailed tables with more than 100 cells cannot be released at the block group level. 5. For the Selected Population Profiles, there must be at least 50 unweighted sample cases over the 5-year period in the universe (specific population subgroup) in a given geographic area for the profile to be released. 6. For workplace tables, there must be at least 50 unweighted or 300 weighted workers in sample over the 5-year period in a given workplace for the table to be released. 7. For the residence and workplace tables where means of transportation (mode) is crossed with one or more other variables, there must be at least three unweighted workers in sample for each transportation mode in a given place for the table to be released. Otherwise the data must be collapsed or suppressed and complementary suppression must be applied. There is no threshold on univariate tables. Elaine Murakami FHWA Office of Planning elaine.murakami(a)dot.gov Note: please update my contact information. My previous email address will likely expire on March 11. 206-220-4460 ________________________________ This e-mail transmission (including any attachments) contains information that is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you received this e-mail in error, we request that you contact us immediately by telephone or return e-mail, and that you delete this message from your computer. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.