Would you please add me to the email list for CTPP listserve.
Thanks
Caroline WM Leung
Senior Research Analyst
PAG_logotype
177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 792-1093 x514 (tel)
(520) 620-6981 (fax)
www.pagnet.orgcleung(a)pagnet.org
Hilton, Columbia Hall 3
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Robert Schiffer <rschiffer(a)camsys.com>wrote:
> Elaine, do you know what room this session will be in? -Rob
>
> Robert G. Schiffer, AICP
> Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
> 1566 Village Square Boulevard, Suite 2
> Tallahassee, FL 32309
> tel 850 219 6388 fax 850 219 6389 cel 850 570 8958
> e-mail rschiffer(a)camsys.com
> www.camsys.com
>
>
>
> From: <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov>
> To: <ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net>
> Date: 01/09/2012 04:25 PM
> Subject: [CTPP] Incorporating Social Media into Transportation
> Surveys WORKSHOP on Sunday, Jan 22 TRB
> Sent by: ctpp-news-bounces(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> For those of you who have not yet completed your TRB Schedules, or would
> adjust your schedule for an excellent opportunity on a timely topic:
>
>
>
> Please join us from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m. on Sunday, Jan 22
>
>
>
> This workshop will identify how the industry has adapted the use of Social
> Media and other technologies to improve survey research. First, lessons
> learned and sampling challenges will be discussed. This will be followed
> by examples of how data published on social media sites can be mined.
> Workshop outcomes are anticipated to include a list of agreed-upon
> applications of social media in transportation surveys, as well as a
> prioritized list of topics for future research.
>
>
>
> Sponsoring Committee(s)
>
> ABJ40 Travel Survey Methods
>
> ADA60 Public Involvement
>
> AP030 Public Transportation Marketing and Fare Policy
>
>
>
> >From your friend,
>
> Elaine Murakami, previous chair of ABJ40 Travel Survey Methods
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ctpp-news mailing list
> ctpp-news(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
> http://ryoko.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ctpp-news mailing list
> ctpp-news(a)ryoko.chrispy.net
> http://ryoko.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
>
>
--
Krishnan Viswanathan
1101 High Meadow Dr
Tallahassee FL 32311
For those of you who have not yet completed your TRB Schedules, or would adjust your schedule for an excellent opportunity on a timely topic:
Please join us from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m. on Sunday, Jan 22
This workshop will identify how the industry has adapted the use of Social Media and other technologies to improve survey research. First, lessons learned and sampling challenges will be discussed. This will be followed by examples of how data published on social media sites can be mined. Workshop outcomes are anticipated to include a list of agreed-upon applications of social media in transportation surveys, as well as a prioritized list of topics for future research.
Sponsoring Committee(s)
ABJ40 Travel Survey Methods
ADA60 Public Involvement
AP030 Public Transportation Marketing and Fare Policy
>From your friend,
Elaine Murakami, previous chair of ABJ40 Travel Survey Methods
Hi everyone, Just a quick reminder that there will be a census workshop at the TRB Annual Meeting again this year. Please see below for more details. Thank you!
TRB 91st Annual Meeting (January 22-26, 2012)
Event Title: C2KX + ACS1, 3, 5 = Census Data of the Future
Event Date: Jan 22 2012 9:00AM- 12:00PM
Event Location: Hilton, Cabinet
Sponsored By: Urban Transportation Data and Information Systems (ABJ30)
Event Description: The recent changes in the collection and dissemination of census data, including the use of the American Community Survey as a replacement for the long-form census questions, will require transportation planners and researchers to learn new skills and practices. This workshop focuses on how to obtain census data, how to assess which data set to use when, as well as how not to use the data. Workshop participants will receive training on the American FactFinder 2 website and other resources.
Presentations:
Census 2010: The New Gold Standard (P12-5593)
Fields, Alison - Census Bureau
ACS: Not the Census, But Worth Its Weight in Gold (P12-5594)
McKenzie, Brian - Census Bureau
AFF2: Where the Gold Is Hidden (P12-5807)
Rohanna, Kristen - San Diego Association of Governments
Reschovsky, Clara - Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
CTPP: Gold, Studded with Diamonds (P12-5595)
Christopher, Ed - Federal Highway Administration
PUMS: The New Platinum (P12-5596)
Tierney, Kevin - Consultant
Kristen Rohanna
Senior Research Analyst
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
401 B St., Ste 800
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: 619.699.6918
Fax: 619.699.1905
kroh(a)sandag.org<mailto:kroh(a)sandag.org>
Hi all,
A question came in regarding contracting language and teams with Universities vis a vis the RFP for Commuting in America IV. Below is the essence of the question and the answer.
Penelope
Question:
As a state university, we are subject to certain
statutory limits on things like insurance, indemnity, etc. We
also must allow our students and faculty to publish freely so often we
need minor tweaking of certain IP or Copyrights language. We are
wondering how to address this at the proposal stage? Is it allowable to
take any exceptions to RFP language at this stage? How should we
address? Typically we have successfully negotiated compromise language,
but there are instances of RFPs where no exceptions are allowed, but
items can be addressed at negotiation stage, or there are the RFPs where
the language must stand as is, no negotiation or changes allowed.
Answer:
In this case, items can be addressed at the post award negotiation stage. AASHTO is confidant that a workable solution for any team with a university can be achieved.
When I did a download from AFF2 last week, asking for "all MCDs in
Oakland County" (a Michigan county), I got names.
At 05:12 PM 12/27/2011, you wrote:
>Content-Language: en-US
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>
>boundary="_000_03B824D8C8D97C4C8486430CC10843AB64730ED25Ccygnusx1morpc_"
>
>I see the names of the geographies, but the data just gives me the
>fips codes, is there a way to get the political names in a download?
>
>Nancy Reger, AICP
>Deputy Director, Transportation
>MORPC
>111 Liberty St. Ste. 100
>Columbus, Ohio 43215
>nreger(a)morpc.org
>614-233-4154
>
>_______________________________________________
>ctpp-news mailing list
>ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
>http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia C. (Patty) Becker 248/354-6520
APB Associates/SEMCC FAX 248/354-6645
28300 Franklin Road Home 248/355-2428
Southfield, MI 48034 pbecker(a)umich.edu
I see the names of the geographies, but the data just gives me the fips codes, is there a way to get the political names in a download?
Nancy Reger, AICP
Deputy Director, Transportation
MORPC
111 Liberty St. Ste. 100
Columbus, Ohio 43215
nreger(a)morpc.org
614-233-4154
Nancy,
In Michigan, cities are legally separated from
the townships out of which they may have been
formed. Cities are both MCDs and
Places. Villages are just Places, while
townships are just MCDs, and MCD data include any
villages (but not cities) that may be inside the townships.
In the decennial census, there is a summary level
that gives you villages within townships and
township balances. That summary level (the number
of which escapes me at the moment) does not
appear to be on ACS-5 year. However, I think you
can get the villages by themselves, and then you
can subtract them from the townships they're
in. If they span two townships, you're out of
luck, except that you could proportion them based on the census data.
Hope this helps.
Patty Becker
At 03:02 PM 12/27/2011, you wrote:
>Content-Language: en-US
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>
>boundary="_000_03B824D8C8D97C4C8486430CC10843AB64730ED206cygnusx1morpc_"
>
>Usually I need to use a place fips AND a county
>subdivision fips code to get to the geography I
>need, and the unincorporated areas have a
>99999 place code. But the ACS data doesnt
>include both of these in any summary level I can
>find and I cant figure out how to separate
>cities and villages that are inside townships
>from the unincorporated township parts this
>might be a unique Ohio need. Has anyone been able to do this?
>
>
>Nancy Reger, AICP
>Deputy Director, Transportation
>MORPC
>111 Liberty St. Ste. 100
>Columbus, Ohio 43215
>nreger(a)morpc.org
>614-233-4154
>
>_______________________________________________
>ctpp-news mailing list
>ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
>http://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia C. (Patty) Becker 248/354-6520
APB Associates/SEMCC FAX 248/354-6645
28300 Franklin Road Home 248/355-2428
Southfield, MI 48034 pbecker(a)umich.edu
Usually I need to use a place fips AND a county subdivision fips code to get to the geography I need, and the unincorporated areas have a "99999" place code. But the ACS data doesn't include both of these in any summary level I can find and I can't figure out how to separate cities and villages that are inside townships from the unincorporated township parts- this might be a unique Ohio need. Has anyone been able to do this?
Nancy Reger, AICP
Deputy Director, Transportation
MORPC
111 Liberty St. Ste. 100
Columbus, Ohio 43215
nreger(a)morpc.org
614-233-4154