CTPP

ctpp@listserv.transportation.org

5 participants
3069 discussions

Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents

by Patricia Becker

If the Michigan tract to tract files can be found for 1980 and/or 1990, I'd sure be interested in having them. I did not see anything on the attached Word file. Patty Becker On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Krishnan Viswanathan < krisviswanathan(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Elaine > > Are there any plans to post the 1990 and 1980 data online so that > interested parties can download the same? > > Krishnan > > On Fri, May 15, 2015, 2:06 PM <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov> wrote: > >> 1990 CTPP Part 7 at tract level! I did not remember that. I had >> Brian Gardner look for the CDs in my cubicle at USDOT Navy Yard. JJ Zang >> will pick them up in the later part of next week (after the TRB Planning >> applications conference) and make a copy for Chuck. There are 4 CDs and >> until we look at them, we will not know if all the states are included. >> >> Elaine >> >> p.s. Bob Paddock of Met Council found the 1980 UTPP file layouts and >> will be sending them to me! So, now we can write SAS code to read in the >> flat ASCII files. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] >> On Behalf Of Ed Christopher >> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:30 AM >> To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net >> Subject: Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents >> >> Chuck- I wonder if the 1990 CTPP part 7 will help. It had tracts at the >> workplace but I am not sure if it covered the the whole state. And then >> finding it is another issue. Here is what i found to atleast shed some >> light on part 7, see page 188. >> http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/1995/cp4/cp4.pdf. I could not >> find any of my 1990 transview versions of the data. I know I have a >> complete set minus one state somewhere. If you can find one of the CDs >> even though you can not extract the data without the extraction software >> look on it to see if there are any PDF files with documentation stashed on >> it. I seem to recall that there is. >> >> Sorry I could not be any more help right now. >> >> On 5/15/2015 11:00 AM, Charles Purvis wrote: >> > Hi all! >> > >> > Ed or Elaine will probably be able to answer my question, but all might >> (or might not) be interested. >> > >> > I’m interested in developing a historical database showing tract-level >> data on total population, land area, and workers-at-workplace, for 1990, >> 2000 and 2006/10. I want this at a statewide (California) level, not just >> for the metropolitan areas. This is part of an ongoing research project on >> describing changes in rural/suburban/urban patterns in California (perhaps >> elsewhere, as well). >> > >> > The 2006/10 CTPP includes a tract-level summary level, so I have been >> able to obtain a statewide, census tract level file of workers-at-work from >> Part 2 tables. >> > >> > Similarly, about 11 years ago I extracted a block group-level file of >> population (Census SF3) and workers-at-work (CTPP 2000, Part 2), which is >> easily aggregated to census tract level. >> > >> > The 1990 CTPP is the first “nationwide” CTPP product. The “statewide” >> element includes place-to-place, county-to-county for ALL counties in the >> USA, including rural (non-metropolitan) counties. On the other hand, the >> “urban” elements of the CTPP is restricted to metropolitan counties, and >> the finest level geographies are either TAZ, block group or census tract. >> Whether or not the TAZes aggregate to census tracts is unknown. >> > >> > So, am I correct to assume that the Part 2 (workplace tables) from the >> 1990 CTPP do NOT include tract-of-work data for non-metropolitan counties? >> That’s my central question. >> > >> > A secondary question is: is there a scanned/PDF version of the 1990 >> > CTPP documentation? (I searched my old website, and I don’t think I >> > have it in electronic format….) >> > >> > I know that the 1980 UTPP was only completed for metropolitan areas, on >> a cost-reimbursable basis. Some MPOs in California didn’t participate in >> the 1980 program. >> > >> > That’s all for now! >> > >> > Chuck Purvis >> > retired-MTC >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ctpp-news mailing list >> > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net >> > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news >> >> -- >> Ed Christopher >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ctpp-news mailing list >> ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net >> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ctpp-news mailing list >> ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net >> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news >> > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > -- Patricia C. (Patty) Becker APB Associates/Southeast Michigan Census Council (SEMCC) 28300 Franklin Rd, Southfield, MI 48034 office: 248-354-6520 home:248-355-2428 pbecker(a)umich.edu

10 years, 2 months

Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents

by Krishnan Viswanathan

Elaine Are there any plans to post the 1990 and 1980 data online so that interested parties can download the same? Krishnan On Fri, May 15, 2015, 2:06 PM <Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov> wrote: > 1990 CTPP Part 7 at tract level! I did not remember that. I had Brian > Gardner look for the CDs in my cubicle at USDOT Navy Yard. JJ Zang will > pick them up in the later part of next week (after the TRB Planning > applications conference) and make a copy for Chuck. There are 4 CDs and > until we look at them, we will not know if all the states are included. > > Elaine > > p.s. Bob Paddock of Met Council found the 1980 UTPP file layouts and will > be sending them to me! So, now we can write SAS code to read in the flat > ASCII files. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] > On Behalf Of Ed Christopher > Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:30 AM > To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > Subject: Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents > > Chuck- I wonder if the 1990 CTPP part 7 will help. It had tracts at the > workplace but I am not sure if it covered the the whole state. And then > finding it is another issue. Here is what i found to atleast shed some > light on part 7, see page 188. > http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/1995/cp4/cp4.pdf. I could not > find any of my 1990 transview versions of the data. I know I have a > complete set minus one state somewhere. If you can find one of the CDs > even though you can not extract the data without the extraction software > look on it to see if there are any PDF files with documentation stashed on > it. I seem to recall that there is. > > Sorry I could not be any more help right now. > > On 5/15/2015 11:00 AM, Charles Purvis wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Ed or Elaine will probably be able to answer my question, but all might > (or might not) be interested. > > > > I’m interested in developing a historical database showing tract-level > data on total population, land area, and workers-at-workplace, for 1990, > 2000 and 2006/10. I want this at a statewide (California) level, not just > for the metropolitan areas. This is part of an ongoing research project on > describing changes in rural/suburban/urban patterns in California (perhaps > elsewhere, as well). > > > > The 2006/10 CTPP includes a tract-level summary level, so I have been > able to obtain a statewide, census tract level file of workers-at-work from > Part 2 tables. > > > > Similarly, about 11 years ago I extracted a block group-level file of > population (Census SF3) and workers-at-work (CTPP 2000, Part 2), which is > easily aggregated to census tract level. > > > > The 1990 CTPP is the first “nationwide” CTPP product. The “statewide” > element includes place-to-place, county-to-county for ALL counties in the > USA, including rural (non-metropolitan) counties. On the other hand, the > “urban” elements of the CTPP is restricted to metropolitan counties, and > the finest level geographies are either TAZ, block group or census tract. > Whether or not the TAZes aggregate to census tracts is unknown. > > > > So, am I correct to assume that the Part 2 (workplace tables) from the > 1990 CTPP do NOT include tract-of-work data for non-metropolitan counties? > That’s my central question. > > > > A secondary question is: is there a scanned/PDF version of the 1990 > > CTPP documentation? (I searched my old website, and I don’t think I > > have it in electronic format….) > > > > I know that the 1980 UTPP was only completed for metropolitan areas, on > a cost-reimbursable basis. Some MPOs in California didn’t participate in > the 1980 program. > > > > That’s all for now! > > > > Chuck Purvis > > retired-MTC > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ctpp-news mailing list > > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > -- > Ed Christopher > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news >

10 years, 2 months

[CTPP] REVISED DATE for 2009-2013 ACS County-to-County Flow tabulation

by Elaine.Murakami＠dot.gov

Hi Everyone - Yesterday, at the CTPP Oversight Board meeting, Brian McKenzie of the Census Bureau informed us that although this was originally planned for May 2015, the new date for the product release is "early August" 2015. As mentioned in earlier posts regarding this file, it will include total workers, and a short list of travel modes: Drive Alone, carpool, transit, and other. Elaine Murakami FHWA Office of Planning 206-220-4460 (in Seattle)

10 years, 2 months

Re: [CTPP] Consultants, Academics using CTPP

by Weinberger Penelope

I must have been unclear, I mean all users who have clients for whom they use this data set. From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Weinberger Penelope Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 4:33 PM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] Vendors using CTPP Hi, If you are a vendor, or consultant, or academic, who uses the CTPP data please email me at pweinberger(a)aashto.org<mailto:pweinberger(a)aashto.org> We are in the process of developing the next data request and we would like your input on several things. Please send me your contact info. Thanks! Penelope Z. Weinberger CTPP Program Manager AASHTO 202-624-3556 ctpp.transportation.org

10 years, 2 months

Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents

by Paddock

Elaine, I retained a print of the 1980 UTPP 'Data Dictionary' for the various tape files. Is this what you are seeking? BOB Bob Paddock Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Bob.paddock(a)metc.state.mn.us 651 602-1340 -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Elaine.Murakami(a)dot.gov Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 11:58 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Cc: JZang(a)camsys.com Subject: Re: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents Hi Everyone -- (Ed started working on his response before me!) ALL of the 1990 CTPP are available at BTS. The easiest way is to use a search engine and say "BTS 1990 CTPP". JJ Zang our CTPP tech support will download the 1990 file documentation and send it directly to Chuck Purvis. Re: 1990 CTPP outside of metropolitan areas. The Census Bureau was not confident about geocoding workplace locations outside of metropolitan areas at that point in time. Re: 1980 CTPP When Nanda Srinivasan worked for the CTPP program, he collected a FEW files from States and MPOs. Most of these are flat ASCII files. We are looking for file layout information. If you have a copy of the file layout (that is, which columns are which variables), please send to me. This was back in the days where, the part 1 record was in 8 "segments". We can probably figure it out, by dumping records to print, but that sounds painful. My goal is to send these files to ICPSR at Univ of Michigan but they want files in SAS format. Elaine Murakami FHWA Office of Planning 206-220-4460 (in Seattle) -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Charles Purvis Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 9:00 AM To: CTPP-News CTPP-News Subject: [CTPP] 1990 and 2000 CTPP contents Hi all! Ed or Elaine will probably be able to answer my question, but all might (or might not) be interested. I’m interested in developing a historical database showing tract-level data on total population, land area, and workers-at-workplace, for 1990, 2000 and 2006/10. I want this at a statewide (California) level, not just for the metropolitan areas. This is part of an ongoing research project on describing changes in rural/suburban/urban patterns in California (perhaps elsewhere, as well). The 2006/10 CTPP includes a tract-level summary level, so I have been able to obtain a statewide, census tract level file of workers-at-work from Part 2 tables. Similarly, about 11 years ago I extracted a block group-level file of population (Census SF3) and workers-at-work (CTPP 2000, Part 2), which is easily aggregated to census tract level. The 1990 CTPP is the first “nationwide” CTPP product. The “statewide” element includes place-to-place, county-to-county for ALL counties in the USA, including rural (non-metropolitan) counties. On the other hand, the “urban” elements of the CTPP is restricted to metropolitan counties, and the finest level geographies are either TAZ, block group or census tract. Whether or not the TAZes aggregate to census tracts is unknown. So, am I correct to assume that the Part 2 (workplace tables) from the 1990 CTPP do NOT include tract-of-work data for non-metropolitan counties? That’s my central question. A secondary question is: is there a scanned/PDF version of the 1990 CTPP documentation? (I searched my old website, and I don’t think I have it in electronic format….) I know that the 1980 UTPP was only completed for metropolitan areas, on a cost-reimbursable basis. Some MPOs in California didn’t participate in the 1980 program. That’s all for now! Chuck Purvis retired-MTC _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

10 years, 3 months

Re: [CTPP] Vendors using CTPP

by Weinberger Penelope

Hi, If you are a vendor who uses the CTPP data please email me at pweinberger(a)aashto.org<mailto:pweinberger(a)aashto.org> We are in the process of developing the next data request and we would like your input on several things. Please send me your contact info. Thanks! Penelope Z. Weinberger CTPP Program Manager AASHTO 202-624-3556 ctpp.transportation.org

10 years, 3 months

[CTPP] April CTPP "Status Report"

by Ed Christopher

The latest issue of the CTPP "Status Report" newsletter is now posted on the TRB Census Subcommittee website. Featured in this issue are the activities of the Subcommittee at the TRB Annual Meeting including a writeup from two posters that were presented at a very successful poster session. Other articles include an update from on the CTPP program, an article discussing the application of CTPP data for the validation of a regional travel forecasting model in the Phoenix area and another article focusing on the use of ACS data to estimate the impact of state employees on Austin congestion plus more. The newletter can found at the Subcommittee's website at http://www.trbcensus.com/ The direct link to the newsletter is http://www.trbcensus.com/newsltr/sr0415.pdf The newsletter is also posted on the FHWA website at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/census_issues/ctpp/status_report/sr0415/in… -- Ed Christopher

10 years, 4 months

[CTPP] FW: American Community Survey (ACS) Data Products Survey

by Weinberger Penelope

From: U.S. Census Bureau [mailto:census(a)subscriptions.census.gov] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:37 AM To: Weinberger Penelope Subject: American Community Survey (ACS) Data Products Survey [ACS Banner] American Community Survey (ACS) Data Products Survey The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey Office (ACSO) is conducting a survey to gather data user feedback on ACS data products. We want to ensure the ACS program continues to produce relevant and timely data products that meet the needs of and are accessible to the public. You are invited to provide feedback on the content of the ACS data products and usage of geographic areas, the coinciding documentation currently provided on our website, as well as the way in which our data products are accessed and disseminated. We want to hear from you! To access the survey please visit our website<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…>. It should take no longer than about 15 minutes to complete. We are requesting that you please complete the survey by May 29, 2015. For more information pertaining to the ACS Program, you can: * Sign up to receive ACS Email Updates<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> * Become a member of the ACS Data Users Online Community<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> * Register to attend the 2nd annual ACS Data Users Conference<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…>, which will be held at the College Park Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, Hyattsville, Maryland, on May 11-13, 2015. Thank you for your continued interest in the ACS Program and for participating in this very important survey on ACS data products, documentation, and dissemination. We look forward to sharing the results with you in the near future. The ACS provides reliable statistics that are used to make informed decisions about the future. These statistics are required by all levels of government to manage or evaluate a wide range of programs, but are also useful for research, business, education, journalism, and advocacy. If you have questions about this survey, please call our Customer Services Center on 1 (800) 923-8282. Thank you, American Community Survey Office U.S. Census Bureau [Bookmark and Share]<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> ________________________________ [http://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/fancy_images/USCENSUS/2012/03/74…] [http://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/fancy_images/USCENSUS/2014/08/34…] CONNECT WITH US ON SOCIAL MEDIA<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…>. SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Unsubscribe<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> | Remove me from All Subscriptions<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> | Help<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> ________________________________ This is an official email from the U.S. Census Bureau. If you have any questions or comments, please contact us (http://www.census.gov/about/contact-us.html<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…>).

10 years, 4 months

[CTPP] Houston, We Have a (Traffic) Problem

by Ed.Christopher＠dot.gov

You might want to check out the latest post from Terri Ann Lowenthal of The Census Project who nicely points out the importance of Census ACS data to transportation projects and the disconnects that exist when it comes to funding it, or the Census for that matter. ------------------------ Houston-area residents have been wasting a lot of time in traffic. Fortunately, Federal Highway Administration funds have helped expand the US 290/Hempstead Corridor, the major artery bringing commuters to and from their jobs in and around the Lone Star State's largest city. I know this because Rep. John Culberson (R-TX) highlighted the $267 million in federal grant money for this project on his congressional website. Rep. Culberson is the new chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee that decides how much money the U.S. Census Bureau should get every year. http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/censusblog/~3/D5uNEUHYt6k/?utm_source=feedbu… Ed Christopher

10 years, 4 months

[CTPP] FW: American FactFinder will be Unavailable on April 11th

by Weinberger Penelope

From: U.S. Census Bureau [mailto:census(a)subscriptions.census.gov] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 3:17 PM To: Weinberger Penelope Subject: American FactFinder will be Unavailable on April 11th Scheduled Maintenance on American FactFinder American FactFinder ________________________________ April 7, 2015 Scheduled Maintenance on American FactFinder American FactFinder will be unavailable while we perform system maintenance. This will occur from 9am EST April 11th until 9am EST April 12th. We apologize for any inconvenience. [Bookmark and Share]<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> ________________________________ [http://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/fancy_images/USCENSUS/2012/03/74…] [http://content.govdelivery.com/attachments/fancy_images/USCENSUS/2014/08/34…] CONNECT WITH US ON SOCIAL MEDIA<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…>. SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Unsubscribe<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> | Remove me from All Subscriptions<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> | Help<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…> ________________________________ This is an official email from the U.S. Census Bureau. If you have any questions or comments, please contact us (http://www.census.gov/about/contact-us.html<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbWFpbGluZ2lkP…>).

10 years, 4 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

CTPP