CTPP

ctpp@listserv.transportation.org

5 participants
3069 discussions

[CTPP] CTPP 2006-2010 Nationwide County Flow File is available!

by Liang Long

Hi, all We have developed this county flow file from CTPP 2006-2010. The file includes flows by means of transportation from CTPP 2000, CTPP 2006-2008 and CTPP 2006-2010. Margin of Error is also included for CTPP 2006-2010 and CTPP 2006-2008. The readme file is also provided. You can download the data in CSV format from the following link: ftp://ftp.camsys.com/clientsupport/CTPPdata/County%20Flows/MOT/ Username: 8305CTPP Password: 1900NJA Please note the username and password are case sensitive. Enjoy! Liang Long Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4800 Hampden Lane Suite 800 Bethesda, MD 20814 tel 301 347 0100 fax 301 347 0101 FHWA 202-366-6971 e-mail llong(a)camsys.com www.camsys.com

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] (no subject)

by Liang.Long.CTR＠dot.gov

Hi, Sulabh CTPP 2006-2010 is period estimates. For average autos,. the estimates means average autos owned over a five-year period. Due to economic recession starting with the year of 2007, it’s hard to say if the 2006-2010 average autos are much closer to the year of 2008 or to the year of 2010. There is no certain answer here. There are several tables in the CTPP 2006-2010 which include vehicles information. If users are interested in the aggregate number of vehicles in households, they can use Table B111103 - Aggregate Number of Vehicles Available in Households. The potential issue is that Table B111103 uses the privacy protected ACS microdataset, whose weights are adjusted for workers and not households. There is another table, Table A111102. which is a univariable distribution of Vehicles Available. As part of CTPP utility project funded by AASHTO, we compared Table B111103 and Table A111102 and no substantial differences have been identified for aggregate number of vehicles between the perturbed and real surveyed data for big geographies. But the data reliabilities for Table B111103 in small geographies, such as TAZs, are not validated yet. Hope this helps. Liang ________________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] on behalf of Sulabh Aryal [saryal(a)richmondregional.org] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 11:46 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: [CTPP] (no subject) Hello everyone, We here in Richmond MPO are developing the Socioeconomic data for our Long Range Transportation plan. One of the important components of the data is the total number of automobiles (CTPP Table B111103) by Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). We have in the past used both the CTPP data and the Virginia DMV registration data to calculate autos by TAZs. Here are the problems we are facing this time around. The base year for our socioeconomic data is 2012. CTPP data is a rolling average from 2006-2010. How would one calculate the estimates for the year 2012 taking CTPP 2006-2008 as the base data? Assuming we do a straight line projection, how many years do we need to project the CTPP data to get the estimates for the year 2012? In other words, do we consider the CTPP data from year 2008 ( which is the mid-year) and project the data by 4 years to get the 2012 estimates or do we take the year 2010 ( which is the end year) and project the data by 2 years to get the 2012 estimates. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Sulabh Aryal Associate Planner Richmond Regional Planning District Commission 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23235 Phone: 804.323.2033 3 Fax: 804.323.2025 saryal(a)richmondregional.org<mailto:saryal(a)richmondregional.org> 3 www.richmondregional.org<http://www.richmondregional.org>

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] (no subject)

by Birat Pandey

Hi Sulabh, If your scope of the work permits, you may also want to consider the transportation accessibility/network when estimating auto-ownership. This could be a major factor for areas with good transit access or other transportation alternative. Birat Birat Pandey, PE Senior Transportation Engineer/Modeler Baltimore Metropolitan Council Offices @ McHenry Row 1500 Whetstone Way, Suite 300 Baltimore, MD 21230 Ph: 410-732-0500 x1050 bpandey(a)baltometro.org www.baltometro.org *From:* ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] *On Behalf Of *Steiss, Todd A. *Sent:* Monday, February 03, 2014 12:31 PM *To:* ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net *Subject:* Re: [CTPP] (no subject) I would look at the auto per household ratio or auto per person ratio from the CTPP 2006-2008 base data and use that to estimate future autos by TAZ. I think you will be better off using ratios tied to population or households so that the growth in autos at the TAZ level will keep pace with the growth in households and/or population. You wouldn't want a TAZ to have only 10% growth in autos if the household data shows a growth of 50% for that same TAZ. *Todd A. Steiss, AICP, GISPSenior Planner* *Parsons Brinckerhoff* *121 West Trade Street, Suite 1950* *Charlotte, NC 28202* *Direct: 704-342-5411Main: 704-342-5401* *Mobile: 704-906-7706Fax: 704-342-8472* *Email: steiss(a)pbworld.com <steiss(a)pbworld.com>* *From:* ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net<ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net>] *On Behalf Of *Sulabh Aryal *Sent:* Monday, February 03, 2014 11:46 AM *To:* ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net *Subject:* [CTPP] (no subject) Hello everyone, We here in Richmond MPO are developing the Socioeconomic data for our Long Range Transportation plan. One of the important components of the data is the total number of automobiles (CTPP Table B111103) by Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). We have in the past used both the CTPP data and the Virginia DMV registration data to calculate autos by TAZs. Here are the problems we are facing this time around. The base year for our socioeconomic data is 2012. CTPP data is a rolling average from 2006-2010. How would one calculate the estimates for the year 2012 taking CTPP 2006-2008 as the base data? Assuming we do a straight line projection, how many years do we need to project the CTPP data to get the estimates for the year 2012? In other words, do we consider the CTPP data from year 2008 ( which is the mid-year) and project the data by 4 years to get the 2012 estimates or do we take the year 2010 ( which is the end year) and project the data by 2 years to get the 2012 estimates. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, *Sulabh Aryal* *Associate Planner* Richmond Regional Planning District Commission 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23235 Phone: 804.323.2033 3 Fax: 804.323.2025 saryal(a)richmondregional.org 3 www.richmondregional.org ______________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] (no subject)

by Steiss

I would look at the auto per household ratio or auto per person ratio from the CTPP 2006-2008 base data and use that to estimate future autos by TAZ. I think you will be better off using ratios tied to population or households so that the growth in autos at the TAZ level will keep pace with the growth in households and/or population. You wouldn’t want a TAZ to have only 10% growth in autos if the household data shows a growth of 50% for that same TAZ. Todd A. Steiss, AICP, GISP Senior Planner Parsons Brinckerhoff 121 West Trade Street, Suite 1950 Charlotte, NC 28202 Direct: 704-342-5411 Main: 704-342-5401 Mobile: 704-906-7706 Fax: 704-342-8472 Email: steiss(a)pbworld.com<mailto:steiss(a)pbworld.com> From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Sulabh Aryal Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 11:46 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: [CTPP] (no subject) Hello everyone, We here in Richmond MPO are developing the Socioeconomic data for our Long Range Transportation plan. One of the important components of the data is the total number of automobiles (CTPP Table B111103) by Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). We have in the past used both the CTPP data and the Virginia DMV registration data to calculate autos by TAZs. Here are the problems we are facing this time around. The base year for our socioeconomic data is 2012. CTPP data is a rolling average from 2006-2010. How would one calculate the estimates for the year 2012 taking CTPP 2006-2008 as the base data? Assuming we do a straight line projection, how many years do we need to project the CTPP data to get the estimates for the year 2012? In other words, do we consider the CTPP data from year 2008 ( which is the mid-year) and project the data by 4 years to get the 2012 estimates or do we take the year 2010 ( which is the end year) and project the data by 2 years to get the 2012 estimates. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Sulabh Aryal Associate Planner Richmond Regional Planning District Commission 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23235 Phone: 804.323.2033 3 Fax: 804.323.2025 saryal(a)richmondregional.org<mailto:saryal(a)richmondregional.org> 3 www.richmondregional.org<http://www.richmondregional.org> ______________________________________________________________________ NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain confidential information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use, disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of, or reliance on this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or you are not an authorized recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies.

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] (no subject)

by Patricia Becker

Sulabh, If you have the VA registration data geocoded to block so that you can aggregate to TAZ, and the dataset is not too messed up with post office boxes, etc., and you can screen out the business registrations, I'd go just with that dataset and not even use the CTPP. The MOEs (margins of error) at the TAZ level are enormous, to say nothing of the timing problem that you discuss. Why bother? Patty Becker On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Sulabh Aryal <saryal(a)richmondregional.org>wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > > We here in Richmond MPO are developing the Socioeconomic data for our Long > Range Transportation plan. One of the important components of the data is > the total number of automobiles (CTPP Table B111103) by Traffic Analysis > Zones (TAZs). We have in the past used both the CTPP data and the Virginia > DMV registration data to calculate autos by TAZs. > > > > Here are the problems we are facing this time around. The base year for > our socioeconomic data is 2012. CTPP data is a rolling average from > 2006-2010. How would one calculate the estimates for the year 2012 taking > CTPP 2006-2008 as the base data? Assuming we do a straight line projection, > how many years do we need to project the CTPP data to get the estimates for > the year 2012? In other words, do we consider the CTPP data from year 2008 > ( which is the mid-year) and project the data by 4 years to get the 2012 > estimates or do we take the year 2010 ( which is the end year) and project > the data by 2 years to get the 2012 estimates. > > > > Any insight would be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks, > > *Sulabh Aryal* > > *Associate Planner* > > > > Richmond Regional Planning District Commission > > 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23235 > > Phone: 804.323.2033 3 Fax: 804.323.2025 > > saryal(a)richmondregional.org 3 www.richmondregional.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > ctpp-news mailing list > ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net > https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news > > -- Patricia C. (Patty) Becker APB Associates/Southeast Michigan Census Council (SEMCC) 28300 Franklin Rd, Southfield, MI 48034 office: 248-354-6520 home:248-355-2428 pbecker(a)umich.edu

11 years, 6 months

[CTPP] (no subject)

by Sulabh Aryal

Hello everyone, We here in Richmond MPO are developing the Socioeconomic data for our Long Range Transportation plan. One of the important components of the data is the total number of automobiles (CTPP Table B111103) by Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). We have in the past used both the CTPP data and the Virginia DMV registration data to calculate autos by TAZs. Here are the problems we are facing this time around. The base year for our socioeconomic data is 2012. CTPP data is a rolling average from 2006-2010. How would one calculate the estimates for the year 2012 taking CTPP 2006-2008 as the base data? Assuming we do a straight line projection, how many years do we need to project the CTPP data to get the estimates for the year 2012? In other words, do we consider the CTPP data from year 2008 ( which is the mid-year) and project the data by 4 years to get the 2012 estimates or do we take the year 2010 ( which is the end year) and project the data by 2 years to get the 2012 estimates. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks, Sulabh Aryal Associate Planner Richmond Regional Planning District Commission 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23235 Phone: 804.323.2033 3 Fax: 804.323.2025 saryal(a)richmondregional.org<mailto:saryal(a)richmondregional.org> 3 www.richmondregional.org<http://www.richmondregional.org>

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] CTPP Training at SACOG (Sacramento, CA) on February 13, 2014 - Census Transportation Planning Package

by Hoctor Mulmat

I don’t know the schedule, but the contact person is Penelope Weinberger (pweinberger(a)aashto.org). Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat Applied Research Division - Criminal Justice/Public Policy San Diego Association of Governments 619-699-7326 From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Jason Gillow Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 7:46 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] CTPP Training at SACOG (Sacramento, CA) on February 13, 2014 - Census Transportation Planning Package Hello Would anyone know if there would be this kind of training in Ohio in 2014 or in the future? Thanks Jason Jason Gillow Research/Planning Coordinator Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission 73 Progress Drive Waverly, OH 45690-1196 Phone: 740-947-2853 Fax: 740-947-3468 www.ovrdc.org<http://www.ovrdc.org> Email: jgillow(a)ovrdc.org<mailto:jgillow(a)ovrdc.org> From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net> [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Tina Glover Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 7:11 PM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> Subject: Re: [CTPP] CTPP Training at SACOG (Sacramento, CA) on February 13, 2014 - Census Transportation Planning Package CORRECTION, The training will be on Thursday February 13, 2014 (not Monday) Thanks! Tina Glover >>> "Tina Glover" <TGlover(a)sacog.org<mailto:TGlover(a)sacog.org>> 1/21/2014 3:44 PM >>> Hi Penelope, In keeping with the flurry of other CTPP announced workshops, could you send my announcement out below? Thanks! Tina ________________________________________________________________________________________ A free training session is offered by AASHTO and FHWA on the Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP), and sponsored by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) There are just a few slots left! What: Free CTPP training When: Monday, February 13, 2014 8:30 am - 4:30 pm Where: SACOG Board Room, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento CA 95814 RSVP email, with 'CTPP workshop' in the Subject line, to Tina Glover: TGlover(a)sacog.org<mailto:TGlover(a)sacog.org> The CTPP is a set of special tabulations designed by transportation planners using data from the Census Bureau. The most current release of CTPP data comes from the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) sample, and includes data from small geographic units such as census tracts and transportation analysis zones (TAZs). The CTPP is a unique census product providing data relating to the journey to work, including travel mode, number of household vehicles, demographic variables, employment status, income and poverty information, life cycle, and many other characteristics. Data tables for home and work locations, and worker flow (home-to-work) are available. A rough agenda for the full-day training session is below: ● Introductions and welcome ● Introduction to the CTPP ● ACS questionnaire: paper exercise ● Data issues ● Break ● Data issues continued ● Find the CTPP table: paper exercise ● Lunch ● Software tour ● Profile exercise: software exercise ● Results of profile exercise ● Wrap up Please register by sending the participant's name and contact information in an e-mail to: Tina Glover: TGlover(a)sacog.org<mailto:TGlover(a)sacog.org>. Space is limited. Please RSVP ASAP! The afternoon session will include training on the new CTPP software. Only a few computers will be provided, so bring a laptop to participate hands-on in this exercise. Sharing personal computers is also an option. Please ensure that your laptop is fully charged, _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net<mailto:ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net> https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] CTPP Training at SACOG (Sacramento, CA) on February 13, 2014 - Census Transportation Planning Package

by Tina Glover

Hi Penelope, In keeping with the flurry of other CTPP announced workshops, could you send my announcement out below? Thanks! Tina ________________________________________________________________________________________ A free training session is offered by AASHTO and FHWA on the Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP), and sponsored by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) There are just a few slots left! What: Free CTPP training When: Monday, February 13, 2014 8:30 am - 4:30 pm Where: SACOG Board Room, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento CA 95814 RSVP email, with 'CTPP workshop' in the Subject line, to Tina Glover: TGlover(a)sacog.org The CTPP is a set of special tabulations designed by transportation planners using data from the Census Bureau. The most current release of CTPP data comes from the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) sample, and includes data from small geographic units such as census tracts and transportation analysis zones (TAZs). The CTPP is a unique census product providing data relating to the journey to work, including travel mode, number of household vehicles, demographic variables, employment status, income and poverty information, life cycle, and many other characteristics. Data tables for home and work locations, and worker flow (home-to-work) are available. A rough agenda for the full-day training session is below: * Introductions and welcome * Introduction to the CTPP * ACS questionnaire: paper exercise * Data issues * Break * Data issues continued * Find the CTPP table: paper exercise * Lunch * Software tour * Profile exercise: software exercise * Results of profile exercise * Wrap up Please register by sending the participant's name and contact information in an e-mail to: Tina Glover: TGlover(a)sacog.org. Space is limited. Please RSVP ASAP! The afternoon session will include training on the new CTPP software. Only a few computers will be provided, so bring a laptop to participate hands-on in this exercise. Sharing personal computers is also an option. Please ensure that your laptop is fully charged, _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] UPDATE 2010 Census Block-Level Data is Changed SF1-P1

by Geoff Olson

The values match one those "(rXXXXX)" parts are removed. I called Census this morning and they informed me that those are footnotes for values that have been revised due to a CQR. I thought that all CQR data was kept separate and I'm not quite sure why it has to be in the same field as the count value and not a separate field. So the important thing to know is that the text file that's included with the downloaded data shows those footnotes and their corrected counts. All those footnotes must be removed from the cell before that data can be used. Thank you, Geoff Olson Transportation Planner Bi-State Regional Commission 1504 3rd Ave. P.O. Box 3368 Rock Island, IL 61204 (309) 793-6302 ext. 151 -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Liang.Long.CTR(a)dot.gov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:37 AM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] UPDATE 2010 Census Block-Level Data is Changed SF1-P1 Hi, Geoff Thanks for sharing your experience with us. When you mentioned that two data sources are off by 696 people, is this caused by rvalues included data? Or even after cleaning up rvalue cells, two datasets are still off by 696? Thanks, Liang ________________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] on behalf of Geoff Olson [golson(a)bistateonline.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 5:25 PM To: 'ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net' Subject: Re: [CTPP] UPDATE 2010 Census Block-Level Data is Changed SF1-P1 I compared our data downloaded in 2011 to the recent data and there are fields in the data from FactFinder2 that have non-numeric characters in the data values. So for the 3 county are that our MPO is in, the count difference was off by 696 people (SF-1 P1). Here is what the data looks like, so please be aware that other data may have the same issue. This is just a small sample, sorted to have the "#VALUE!" cells at the top. The "2011" Blocks are the data we downloaded in 2011 and the "2014" Blocks are the data I downloaded just now. The values are there, but those r values are also included in the data. "2011" Block POP_TOT "2014" Blocks D001 ID Match 2011_2014_diff 171610241012049 167 171610241012049 167(r49517) Yay #VALUE! 171610241012050 78 171610241012050 78(r49518) Yay #VALUE! 171610241012051 86 171610241012051 86(r39321) Yay #VALUE! 171610241012056 135 171610241012056 135(r49515) Yay #VALUE! 171610241012057 3 171610241012057 3(r39322) Yay #VALUE! 171610241012079 51 171610241012079 51(r39318) Yay #VALUE! 171610241023013 17 171610241023013 17(r49516) Yay #VALUE! 191630130001018 90 191630130001018 90(r39585) Yay #VALUE! 191630130001020 48 191630130001020 48(r39586) Yay #VALUE! 191630130001024 19 191630130001024 19(r39587) Yay #VALUE! 191630135001037 2 191630135001037 2(r39591) Yay #VALUE! 170730301001000 0 170730301001000 0 Yay 0 170730301001001 0 170730301001001 0 Yay 0 170730301001002 0 170730301001002 0 Yay 0 170730301001003 0 170730301001003 0 Yay 0 170730301001004 0 170730301001004 0 Yay 0 170730301001005 0 170730301001005 0 Yay 0 170730301001006 0 170730301001006 0 Yay 0 170730301001007 0 170730301001007 0 Yay 0 170730301001008 0 170730301001008 0 Yay 0 170730301001009 0 170730301001009 0 Yay 0 170730301001010 219 170730301001010 219 Yay 0 170730301001011 43 170730301001011 43 Yay 0 170730301001012 64 170730301001012 64 Yay 0 170730301001013 70 170730301001013 70 Yay 0 170730301001014 0 170730301001014 0 Yay 0 170730301001015 0 170730301001015 0 Yay 0 I hope this helps someone else. Thank you, Geoff Olson Transportation Planner Bi-State Regional Commission 1504 3rd Ave. P.O. Box 3368 Rock Island, IL 61204 (309) 793-6302 ext. 151 -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Geoff Olson Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:52 AM To: 'ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net' Subject: [CTPP] 2010 Census Block-Level Data is Changed SF1-P1 Our MPO has been working on getting Census block data aggregated to TAZ levels and we noticed that Census data that was downloaded when 2010 Census data was released does not match 2010 Census Data that was downloaded today. We've done various checks between the two tables (SF1-P1), and the sums are different. Our MPA population count with the older data is 297,986 and the sum the new data is showing us is 297,290. We did check this with ESRI's Community Analyst and it agrees with the older data that our MPA should have a Census 2010 population of 297,986. Is there a reason when Census data might change? If the P1 data has changed, then I'm wondering if other Census data might be different too. Thank you, Geoff Olson Transportation Planner Bi-State Regional Commission 1504 3rd Ave. P.O. Box 3368 Rock Island, IL 61204 (309) 793-6302 ext. 151 This email and all attachments are intended only for the listed recipient(s). This message may contain confidential or privileged information only for use by the listed recipient(s). Do not forward, post or otherwise disclose the contents of this email without the permission of the sender. If you received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Bi-State Regional Commission accepts no responsibility for any damages caused by this message, including those related to viruses or malware. _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news This email and all attachments are intended only for the listed recipient(s). This message may contain confidential or privileged information only for use by the listed recipient(s). Do not forward, post or otherwise disclose the contents of this email without the permission of the sender. If you received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Bi-State Regional Commission accepts no responsibility for any damages caused by this message, including those related to viruses or malware. This email and all attachments are intended only for the listed recipient(s). This message may contain confidential or privileged information only for use by the listed recipient(s). Do not forward, post or otherwise disclose the contents of this email without the permission of the sender. If you received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Bi-State Regional Commission accepts no responsibility for any damages caused by this message, including those related to viruses or malware. _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news This email and all attachments are intended only for the listed recipient(s). This message may contain confidential or privileged information only for use by the listed recipient(s). Do not forward, post or otherwise disclose the contents of this email without the permission of the sender. If you received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Bi-State Regional Commission accepts no responsibility for any damages caused by this message, including those related to viruses or malware.

11 years, 6 months

Re: [CTPP] 2010 Census TAZs & Block Topology Errors

by Geoff Olson

Thank you, Liang. I do still have the files we sent to Census via the FTP upload and those boundaries all match. It's the TAZ files that are currently available for download that don't match blocks and are different than what we uploaded. Thank you, Geoff Olson Transportation Planner Bi-State Regional Commission 1504 3rd Ave. P.O. Box 3368 Rock Island, IL 61204 (309) 793-6302 ext. 151 -----Original Message----- From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Liang.Long.CTR(a)dot.gov Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:10 PM To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net Subject: Re: [CTPP] 2010 Census TAZs & Block Topology Errors Hi, Geoff In theory, the Census TAZs are built from blocks. We are talking with the Census Bureau staff on this issue and will get back to you asap. Thanks for your patience. Liang ________________________________________ From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] on behalf of Geoff Olson [golson(a)bistateonline.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:50 AM To: 'ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net' Subject: [CTPP] 2010 Census TAZs & Block Topology Errors Has anyone else come across instances where there is a topology error between the 2010 Census TAZ boundaries and the 2010 Census Block boundaries? We have a few places around our MPO boundary where these don't match up like they're supposed to. I didn't know if anyone else may have had this issue. Thank you, Geoff Olson Transportation Planner Bi-State Regional Commission 1504 3rd Ave. P.O. Box 3368 Rock Island, IL 61204 (309) 793-6302 ext. 151 This email and all attachments are intended only for the listed recipient(s). This message may contain confidential or privileged information only for use by the listed recipient(s). Do not forward, post or otherwise disclose the contents of this email without the permission of the sender. If you received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Bi-State Regional Commission accepts no responsibility for any damages caused by this message, including those related to viruses or malware. _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news _______________________________________________ ctpp-news mailing list ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net https://www.chrispy.net/mailman/listinfo/ctpp-news This email and all attachments are intended only for the listed recipient(s). This message may contain confidential or privileged information only for use by the listed recipient(s). Do not forward, post or otherwise disclose the contents of this email without the permission of the sender. If you received this message in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Bi-State Regional Commission accepts no responsibility for any damages caused by this message, including those related to viruses or malware.

11 years, 6 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

CTPP