Do you have SAS in your shop?
I can provide you my SAS code for loading, compiling and merging the Redistricting, the AGQ, and the DPSF.
Can't offer any help on the Access. Good luck.
________________________
Todd Graham
Principal Forecaster and Project Manager
Metropolitan Council
390 Robert Street North
Saint Paul, MN 55101
ph: 651/602-1322
email: todd.graham(a)metc.state.mn.us<mailto:todd.graham(a)metc.state.mn.us>
web: http://www.metrocouncil.org/data/
________________________
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Jason Gillow
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 12:07 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] Question on 2010 Census data and linking to the Access file
Hello all
I was wondering if anyone had a chance to figure out how to import the 2010 Redistricting data or the new 2010 demographic profile information into the Access files on the http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/ , under http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ and http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/03-Demographic_Profile/ . I have been confused about this process myself. Does anyone know of any good guides to help? Any ideas or suggestions? I have been using the new American FactFinder 2 too, but that has been a slow and confusing process too.
Thank you
Jason
Jason Gillow
Research/Planning Specialist II
Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission
9329 St Rt 220 E, Suite A
Waverly, OH 45690
Phone 740-947-2853 or 800-223-7491 (In Ohio)
and Fax 740-947-3468
Website: www.ovrdc.org<http://www.ovrdc.org>
E-mail- jgillow(a)ovrdc.org
Jason,
I used the detailed instructions on the Census' website for the state-wide, block-level redistricting data and it worked like a charm (surprisingly!) I'll see if I can find the link.
Lisa J. Miller
Data/Graphics/GIS Manager
Bi-State Regional Commission
1504 Third Avenue, PO Box 3368
Rock Island, IL 61204-3368
309.793-6302 ext. 133
www.bistateonline.org
Visit our new data portal website for the Greater Quad Cities Region, http://www.GreaterQCRegion.org<http://www.greaterqcregion.org/>
From: ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces(a)chrispy.net] On Behalf Of Jason Gillow
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 12:07 PM
To: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: [CTPP] Question on 2010 Census data and linking to the Access file
Hello all
I was wondering if anyone had a chance to figure out how to import the 2010 Redistricting data or the new 2010 demographic profile information into the Access files on the http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/ , under http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ and http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/03-Demographic_Profile/ . I have been confused about this process myself. Does anyone know of any good guides to help? Any ideas or suggestions? I have been using the new American FactFinder 2 too, but that has been a slow and confusing process too.
Thank you
Jason
Jason Gillow
Research/Planning Specialist II
Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission
9329 St Rt 220 E, Suite A
Waverly, OH 45690
Phone 740-947-2853 or 800-223-7491 (In Ohio)
and Fax 740-947-3468
Website: www.ovrdc.org<http://www.ovrdc.org>
E-mail- jgillow(a)ovrdc.org
Our agency is attempting to get a jump on determining what potential
changes may occur to our urbanized area based on the new census data and
the proposed 2010 Census Urban Area criteria. I'm sure that we're not
the only ones out there doing this. We are initially just looking at the
most basic criteria involving the population density requirements, but
we have already run into an issue that we need clarification on with
regards to what should be used as the starting geographic "container".
Specifically, section 1, Identification of Initial Urban Area Cores, of
the proposed criteria (Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 163, August 24,
2010) is causing some confusion. That section outlines a series of
steps that must be followed in the process to define urban areas. The
first step calls for the identification of census tracts that have land
area less than three square miles and a population density of at least
1,000 people per square mile. Stated next in the criteria: "If a
qualifying census tract does not exist, then one or more contiguous
census blocks that have a population density of at least 1,000 people
per square mile are identified and aggregated." Then it is stated,
"This aggregation of continuous census tracts or census blocks, as
appropriate, would be known as the initial urban area core." Our
question: What is the starting geography within which we look for
qualifying census tracts? Within a county? A metropolitan statistical
area? A combined statistical area? Key to the second and third
statements is the use of the words, "IF" and "OR." "IF" no qualifying
tracts are found, then look for qualifying blocks. The initial urban
area core is an aggregation of continuous census tracts OR census
blocks. Since the initial core identified in step one is either tracts
OR blocks, not both, we need to know the geographic container within
which we look for qualifying tracts or blocks. As a side question - is
anyone aware of software/GIS scripts already available out there capable
of running a 2010 urbanized area delineation analysis? I do realize that
since the criteria have not yet been finalized it is very unlikely that
any are available - at least from commercial vendors. Any help would be
appreciated, thanks, Mike CongerMichael D. Conger, P.E.
Senior Transportation Engineer
Knoxville Regional TPO
400 Main Street, Suite 403
Knoxville, TN 37902Ph: 865-215-3813
Fax:865-215-2068
Hello all
I was wondering if anyone had a chance to figure out how to import the 2010 Redistricting data or the new 2010 demographic profile information into the Access files on the http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/ , under http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/01-Redistricting_File--PL_94-171/ and http://www2.census.gov/census_2010/03-Demographic_Profile/ . I have been confused about this process myself. Does anyone know of any good guides to help? Any ideas or suggestions? I have been using the new American FactFinder 2 too, but that has been a slow and confusing process too.
Thank you
Jason
Jason Gillow
Research/Planning Specialist II
Ohio Valley Regional Development Commission
9329 St Rt 220 E, Suite A
Waverly, OH 45690
Phone 740-947-2853 or 800-223-7491 (In Ohio)
and Fax 740-947-3468
Website: www.ovrdc.org
E-mail- jgillow(a)ovrdc.org
Hi All,
If you haven't had a chance to participate in the CTPP software basic training webinar, or you would like to review after having participated in one, the Webinar from April 14th is now available to view at:
http://ctpp.transportation.org/Pages/webinardirectory.aspx
where you can access the webinar and download the supporting and presentation materials.
There is still time and opportunity to participate in a live webinar of CTPP software basic as it is currently scheduled to be presented two more times, on Monday, May 16th at 3:30 eastern and Thursday, June 2nd at 2:00 pm eastern.
To register for one of those, go to:
CTPP Data Access Software Basics
A guided tour through the CTPP Based on three year ACS, including software demo and Q&A
Register for a session now by clicking a date below:
Mon, May 16, 2011 3:30 PM - 4:30 PM EDT <https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/999583609>
Thu, Jun 2, 2011 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EDT <https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/899536416>
Once registered you will receive an email confirming your registration
with information you need to join the Webinar.
System Requirements
PC-based attendees
Required: Windows® 7, Vista, XP or 2003 Server
Macintosh®-based attendees
Required: Mac OS® X 10.4.11 (Tiger®) or newer
<http://img.gotomeeting.com/g2mimages/1x1.gif>
I am out of the office until 05/10/2011.
Please call our main number (301-763-3030) if you need assistance before I
return next Tuesday (5/10).
Thanks.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "[CTPP] Census Vacant
Structure Determination" sent on 4/26/2011 9:41:02 AM.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Does anyone know a source for journey to work data for small geographies (any geography really) post 2000 census?
Nancy Reger, AICP
Deputy Director, Transportation
Mid Ohio Regional Planning Commission
111 Liberty St, Ste 100, Columbus OH 43215
P: (614) 233-4154 /E: nreger(a)morpc.org
This is the same information that was in the attachment yesterday,
however, some people told me they could not open the attachment. I have
also reduced the spreadsheet file, so that it is now limited to those UA
between 40,000 and 299,999 population.
----------------
April 19, 2011, Planning On the Web, UA Notes
These notes are limited to the discussion about Census defined urban
areas (urbanized areas with population 50,000 and above, and urban
clusters with population 2,500 to 49,999).
Urban Area Final Criteria
Mike Ratcliffe, Census Bureau Geography, reported on the status of the
final rules for delineating Urban Areas. He noted that the
transportation community was a significant contributor of comments to
the Federal Register notice on the proposed criteria (
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-20808.htm
<http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-20808.htm> ). All of the
comments have been reviewed and draft criteria written. However, before
the criteria are finalized and sent to the Office of Management of
Budget (OMB) for posting to the Federal Register (FR), the Census
Bureau's Statistical Areas Committee must meet and approve them. The
Statistical Areas Committee is an internal Census Bureau Committee. So
far the committee has been having difficulty finding a date on which to
meet, causing delay. Mike hopes the FR notice with the final criteria
will be out this summer.
In the meantime, the Census Bureau staff has started to work on the
technical process of identifying the Urban Areas under the assumption
that the draft criteria will be approved. If the Statistical Areas
Committee or OMB makes a change to the criteria, staff will have to
revise the process.
Mike then reported on some of the criteria that was submitted to the
Statistical Areas Committee:
Jump criteria - Maintain the 2.5 mile distance. Comments to the FR
notice were about 50/50 on whether to return to the 1.5 mile distance
from 1990 or keep the 2.5 mile from 2000. Comments to the FR notice
also favored maintaining comparability to the 2000 Urban Areas so
maintaining the 2.5 distance threshold is recommended.
Impervious surface - Comments were overwhelming to use the impervious
surface file. The impervious surface file would make sure that built up
areas would be included in Urban Areas. It will have to be seen if this
might impact jumps to capture more area.
Merging or splitting adjacent Urbanized Areas. This topic had the most
comments and the most questions. According to Mike, the proposed final
criteria will call for using the Urbanized Areas from 2000 as a baseline
and keep each as a separate Urbanized Area, even if an Urbanized Area
touches or grows into another Urbanized Area using the 2010 Census
population. They would remain separate as two Urbanized Areas even
though their exact boundaries may change.
Question: What if two separate Urbanized Areas are adjoining and one is
above the TMA threshold and one is below the TMA boundary. Would FHWA
say that both Urbanized Areas would be inside the TMA?
Answer: Historically, FHWA has NOT merged Urbanized Areas, even if they
are adjacent or touching, to make a combined TMA. FHWA has used the
Census Bureau's list of Urbanized Areas with population 200,000 or
above. This could possibly change under re-authorization.
Question: Can someone predict if an Urbanized Area is likely to reach
above the current TMA threshold of 200,000?
Answer: The 2007-2009 ACS 3-year data include all urban areas of 20,000
or more.
Using this data set provides a sense of which urban clusters might have
over 50,000 people when redefined based on 2010 census counts, and thus
are potential urbanized areas. A spreadsheet of this data is embedded
here.
What will be population thresholds for MPOs and TMAs under
re-authorization?
Harlan Miller, FHWA Office of Planning was on hand and noted that the
administration's proposal is expected to be sent to Congress within a
month from now (or even sooner). But, he cautioned that one could not
anticipate what the House or Senate might include in their version of a
transportation bill. Harlan said that for now, it is best to tell
people that until we know otherwise, to use 50,000 as the threshold for
MPOs, and 200,000 as the threshold for TMAs.