********** C E N S U S 2 0 0 0 B U L L E T I N **********
Vol. 3 - No. 5 March 17, 1999
The following is the text of a letter from Commerce Secretary William M.
Daley sent yesterday (March 16) to U.S. Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind.,
chairman of
the U.S. House Committee on Government Reform, and U.S. Rep. Henry
Waxman,
D-Calif., the ranking member of the same committee, regarding the
administration's position on seven bills related to Census 2000:
"Tomorrow, the Government Reform Committee is scheduled to mark up seven
bills related to the conduct of the Decennial Census in 2000. While I
know
we share a common goal of ensuring that Census 2000 is the most accurate
and
cost-effective Decennial possible, the Department of Commerce must
strongly
oppose legislation that would mandate a post census local review,
require
the printing of short census forms in 34 languages, and mandate a second
mailing of census forms.
"According to the Director of the Census Bureau, Kenneth Prewitt, and
the
professionals at the Census Bureau, these three bills would reduce the
accuracy and seriously disrupt the schedule of Census 2000. Based on the
attached detailed analysis of the legislation provided by Dr. Prewitt,
if
this legislation were presented to the President, I would recommend that
he
veto it.
"The Census Bureau is already working on many of the issues that these
and
the other four bills address. For example, the Census Bureau is not
designed
to manage a grant program, but it is working to increase partnerships
with
local governments and tribal and non-profit organizations to increase
participation in Census 2000. In addition, we expect to seek additional
funding for a variety of other activities. And we would appreciate
assistance in making it possible for more individuals to take temporary
census jobs without losing their government benefits.
"Thank you for this opportunity to present our views on the legislation
under consideration by your Committee. I look forward to continuing to
work
with you and other members of Congress to ensure that Census 2000 is the
most accurate census possible."
Sincerely,
William M. Daley (signed)
Attachment (see attached file below)
_____________________________________________________________________
For further information about Census 2000 Bulletins, contact J. Paul
Wyatt
of the Public Information Office on 301-457-3052 (fax: 301-457-3670;
e-mail:
pwyatt(a)census.gov).
MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY
FROM: Kenneth Prewitt
Director, Bureau of the Census
SUBJECT: Census Bureau Position on Bills Concerning 2000 Census
As you are aware, seven bills concerning the 2000 census have recently
been
approved by the Subcommittee on the Census and are pending before the
Committee on Government Reform for consideration. At your request, this
memorandum presents the Census Bureau's analysis of those bills.
While I understand that these bills were introduced with a view to
improving
the 2000 Census, their consequences for an orderly, timely and accurate
census in 2000 are just short of disastrous. The Bureau is at a stage
in
the process where several of the changes to the Operational Plan
proposed by
Chairman Miller would seriously undermine the ability of the Bureau to
complete an accurate and timely census. Were these bills to become law,
the
Congress would either have to significantly delay the starting day of
Census
2000 or require the Census Bureau to field an operational plan which in
our
judgement would decrease accuracy levels. The Census Bureau believes
that
the plan presented to the Administration and the Congress will achieve
the
most accurate results possible in the time frame available for planning
and
implementing Census 2000. Further, the Census Bureau does not believe
that
the Subcommittee bills will reduce the differential undercounts as
effectively as will the Operational Plan that we have presented.
The bill with the most serious potential consequences is H.R. 472, the
"Local Census Quality Check Act." It would mandate an operational
change to
the Census 2000 Plan which is neither timely, effective, nor
cost-efficient
and would return us to inadequate 1990 operations that have now been
substantially improved upon.
Since the Bureau recognizes the importance of local government
participation, we have established a program of local participation in
address accuracy and boundary readjustments which we believe is
superior to
the 1990 Post Census Local Review (PCLR) program. The Census 2000 Local
Update of Census Addresses (LUCA) vastly expands both the interaction
between local governmental units and the Bureau and the time local
governments are given to verify and correct addresses and boundaries.
To
date, twice as many local governments are participating in LUCA compared
to
PCLR in 1990. Notably, these governments cover 85 percent of all
addresses
in the country.
In addition, our plan includes a program to validate the boundaries for
every local and tribal government in the United States and a new
construction program that will resolve most of the address problems
uncovered in the 1990 PCLR. This new program which is currently being
reviewed by our outside advisory groups, will give local governments the
opportunity to add new housing units to the census Master Address File
up to
Census Day, April 1, 2000.
We strongly believe that the Census Bureau's current plan is more
efficient,
more effective, more timely, and will produce greater accuracy in the
time
frame mandated for us by law than would the proposal in H.R. 472.
The Bureau is also deeply concerned about H.R. 929, the "2000 Census
Language Barrier Removal Act." This bill would require the Secretary of
Commerce to print the Census 2000 short form in at least 33 languages
other
than English. The Census Bureau would have to send a questionnaire in
one
of these languages upon request. Were H.R. 929 to become law, the
entire
census questionnaire workflow for receipt, image capture, transcription,
and
key-from-paper would have to be modified. We would have to renegotiate
our
largest contracts including nearly 20 printing contracts; the
contracts
for the Telephone Questionnaire Assistance program; Data Capture and,
Data
Capture Service Centers.
An extensive amount of planning and evaluation has gone into developing
a
system for mailing a precensus letter to 120 million households and for
announcing the availability of questionnaires in six languages including
English, which account for 99 percent of all households in the U.S. The
wording on this pre-census letter has been carefully designed to
minimize
confusion and maximize cooperation. If H.R. 929 became law, we would
have
to figure out how to announce the availability of forms in another 27
languages, which may be of concern to approximately one million
households,
without confusing the remaining 119 million households.
Let me emphasize that the Bureau welcomes interest in this most
difficult
area. Currently, we plan to be as linguistically friendly as we
possibly
can.
We are not indifferent to the 1 percent of U.S. households, which speak
not
just another 27 languages but rather as many as 130 or more languages.
To
reach them, we have developed an integrated language program that
involves
15,000 paid temporary staff positions in the Questionnaire Assistance
Centers, drawn from a wide range of language communities, and will
prepare
15 million assistance guides in several dozen languages. We have also
included a language focus in our partnership agreements with community
organizations.
The third bill that concerns the Bureau is H.R. 928, the "2000 Census
Mail
Outreach Improvement Act." This bill would require the Secretary of
Commerce to conduct a second mailing by sending replacement
questionnaires
either to all households in the original mailing (a "blanket" mailing),
or
to each household not responding to the original mailing (a "targeted"
mailing).
The Bureau has decided not to implement either a blanket or targeted
second
mailing. After thorough analysis, much deliberation, and an evaluation
of
our Dress Rehearsal experience, we concluded that the value of a second
mailing is substantially outweighed by the risks that it introduces in
other
census operations. We originally considered conducting a targeted
second
mailing, but printing vendors informed us they would require at least a
month to send a second mailing targeted only to nonresponding housing
units.
A targeted second mailing would, thus, have significantly delayed the
start
of the nonresponse followup operation. Our experience and research
indicate
that the longer the delay between Census Day and the start of
nonresponse
followup, the more inaccuracies are introduced to the census data.
We also considered a blanket second mailing, that is, mailing a second
questionnaire to every housing unit, whether or not we had received a
response to the original mailing. A National Academy of Sciences panel
advised us that a blanket second mailing could reduce the accuracy of
the
census because of duplication. We nevertheless tested a blanket mailing
in
Dress Rehearsal. While it did increase the overall mail response rate,
the
evaluations indicate that about 40 percent of the households that mailed
back a second questionnaire had also mailed back the initial
questionnaire.
Thus, the Dress Rehearsal processing had to be extended three weeks to
handle the complexity introduced by the large volume of duplicate forms.
For Census 2000, a work load of this magnitude would significantly delay
data processing operations and potentially introduce significant errors
into
the data. In addition, our dress rehearsal experience indicated that
the
public was confused by the second mailing.
The fourth bill that causes the Bureau concern is H.R. 1009, the "2000
Census Community Participation Enhancement Act." This bill would
provide
for grants to units of general local government, tribal organizations,
and
public and private nonprofit organizations. The Census Bureau has a
commitment to fostering the productive involvement of local communities
in
Census 2000, and to this end, it has launched the Partnership Program,
the
Complete Count Committees, the Local Update of Census Address Program,
the
Census in the Schools Program, and more. And we welcome initiatives
that
would provide additional resources to units of general local government,
tribal organizations, and public or private nonprofit organizations that
could be directed to increasing participation rates in Census 2000.
However, the Census Bureau is not equipped to manage a competitive grant
program at this late stage in the decennial cycle. All of our human and
financial resources are properly focused on the sequence of activities
set
forth in our Operational Plan, as submitted to the Census Subcommittee
in
January 1999 and updated on February 23, 1999.
Based on nearly 20 years of experience in the private foundation sector,
I
speak with some knowledge about the complexities of managing competitive
grant programs, made even more complex if they have a matching
provision.
It takes expertise to design, manage, monitor, and assess such programs,
and
it would be imprudent for the Congress to presume that the Census Bureau
has
or could quickly acquire that expertise.
Moreover, there could be tens of thousands of applications. Either the
amount of funds available per awardee would be so low as to raise
questions
about the sincerity of this effort, or there would be many more losers
than
winners. Either outcome places the Bureau in an untenable position. We
will
need strong partnerships even with those governments and local
organizations
that were not successful in the competition, but disappointment on their
part could easily undermine what has become a very healthy partnership.
Two additional bills have been introduced and voted through Subcommittee
for
full committee consideration: H.R. 1010 and H.R. 683. The Bureau does
not
have serious concerns about either of these two bills, so long as their
implementation in their final form does not impose major changes to the
existing operational plan. H.R. 1010 would authorize $300 million for
FY
2000 to carry out promotional, outreach, and marketing activities in
connection with Census 2000. It would effectively triple the Census
Bureau's current projected paid advertising budget. We strongly agree
that
the advertising and promotion budgets will need to be increased.
Currently,
we are reviewing our advertising and marketing efforts in order to
produce
the most effective results.
In our operational plan for a census using traditional census-taking
methods, which we submitted to the Congress on January 14, 1999, we
noted
that we plan to expand our Partnership Program and expand and enhance
the
paid advertising and promotion program. Both of these programs are
geared
toward greater public awareness of Census 2000, which in turn should
lead to
greater public response and cooperation.
Specifically, we plan to expand the Partnership Program to increase
Bureau
partnership staffing and assistance. This expansion will allow the
Bureau
to form additional partnerships with both non-governmental organizations
that represent historically hard-to-enumerate groups and with
governmental
entities, including tribal governments, that have not yet taken the
opportunity to be included in the partnership program. Already, more
than
10,000 partnership agreements have been signed. The expanded program
includes "in-kind" funding to support partners by providing services,
such
as printing locally designed promotional materials for Census 2000.
Moreover, we plan to expand and enhance paid advertising and promotion
by
developing and implementing additional advertising messages. One
additional
message, which we will use before Census Day, will target information
about
community benefits to areas with historically low participation in the
census. Another message will seek the public's cooperation with
enumerators
during the nonresponse followup operation. This is increasingly
important
now that we must make follow-up visits to 45 million housing units,
instead
of 30 million.
Nontraditional advertising methods also would be pursued. Fact sheets
and
promotional materials will be available on a larger scale with the
expanded
program. And finally, we plan to conduct special publicity events that
would bring the Census 2000 message to communities across the Nation.
As
you can see, H.R. 1010 has the potential to assist the Bureau in these
endeavors.
We also plan to expand the "Census in the Schools" program to allow all
schools to participate instead of only those in selected areas. We have
just learned that the committee intends to markup H.R. 1058 without
benefit
of a Subcommittee hearing. The Census Bureau has not had an opportunity
to
analyze H.R. 1058 but would ask that the committee help us ensure we
receive
full funding necessary to meet the objective of 100% participation.
H.R. 683, the "Decennial Census Improvement Act of 1999," would allow
recipients of any Federally funded benefits, including welfare
recipients,
veterans, American Indians, and others to take temporary census jobs
without
losing their Federal benefits. We appreciate any effort to help broaden
the
potential applicant pool for temporary census jobs. Hiring the numbers
of
workers we will need to conduct Census 2000 will be a monumental
challenge
and we will need all the help we can get. We have already secured from
the
Office of Personnel Management a waiver for the Federal civilian and
military retirees, similar to the 1990 waiver. We have also secured a
waiver from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for
recipients
of public housing and American Indian housing assistance. It is our
understanding that individual states and American Indian tribes would
have
the authority to determine how income from working for the Census Bureau
would be counted for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
program,
consistent with the new welfare reform law. We are working closely with
the
states to bring welfare recipients into our workforce and, indeed, to
look
for other ways that would make it easier for people to come to work for
us.
We have already hired some 3,500 welfare recipients to work on our
address-listing and Dress Rehearsal programs. This is the largest
number of
welfare- to-work employees in any agency or department of the federal
government.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
From: Census2000 <Census2000(a)ccmc.org>
House Committee Considers Legislation
Affecting Census Operations
The House Subcommittee on the Census has approved several bills
"designed to provide the additional tools needed to improve the 2000
census," according to Chairman Dan Miller (R-FL), who opposes the Census
Bureau's plan to use scientific sampling methods as a quality check of
the initial population tally. The full Committee on Government Reform
will vote on the bills at a "mark-up" on March 17. The committee
cancelled plans for a hearing that day featuring Commerce Secretary
William Daley and Census Bureau Director Kenneth Prewitt.
Following is a brief description of the legislation considered by the
census subcommittee:
1. "Local Census Quality Check Act" (H.R. 472) H.R. 472 requires
the Census Bureau to implement a post census local review (PCLR) similar
to the 1990 program. The Bureau must give local governments 45 working
days to review housing unit counts and jurisdictional boundaries before
the census figures become final. (The 1990 program did not include a
review of preliminary population counts.) By November 1, 2000, the
Bureau must investigate all challenges to the preliminary counts and
notify local governments of the results. The bill was introduced on
February 2 by Rep. Dan Miller (R-FL), chairman of the Subcommittee on
the Census.
The subcommittee held a hearing to review H.R. 472 on February
11. Several local officials and organizations, including the National
Association of Towns and Townships and the National Association of
Development Organizations, supported reinstatement of a post census
local review in 2000; however, they did not all endorse the specific
requirements of H.R. 472. Richmond Mayor Timothy Kaine, testifying on
behalf of the U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM), said that while he would
not decline an opportunity to review preliminary data, PCLR did not
address the mayors' concerns about the population undercount. He
reiterated USCM's support for a quality-check survey to correct
undercounts identified in the initial tally.
Following the hearing, the panel approved H.R. 472 by a 5 - 0
vote. The Democratic members did not participate in the 'mark-up.'
Invited to testify at a subsequent hearing on March 2, Census Bureau
Director Kenneth Prewitt told the subcommittee that the bill "would
mandate a program that Census professionals believe will not effectively
and efficiently contribute to the overall accuracy of the census."
2. "Decennial Census Improvement Act of 1999" (H.R. 683): Sponsored
by Rep. Carrie Meek (D-FL), H.R. 683 waives consideration of income
earned as a temporary census employee in determining eligibility for
federal benefits (or state and local benefits financed in part with
federal funds) or in determining the amount of a federal or military
pension. The bill's supporters hope it will result in the hiring of more
enumerators who live in the neighborhoods they will canvass. For the
1990 census, Congress enacted similar legislation affecting federal and
military retirees, and some agencies administratively agreed to
disregard census income earned by recipients of federal benefits. The
census subcommittee reviewed H.R. 683 at a March 2 hearing and approved
the measure with bipartisan support on March 4.
3. "2000 Census Mail Outreach Improvement Act" (H.R. 928): H.R. 928
requires the Census Bureau to send a replacement questionnaire either to
all households, or to households that don't respond to the first
mailing. After determining that 40 percent of the second forms mailed
back in last year's dress rehearsal were duplicates, the Census Bureau
decided not to include a replacement questionnaire in its revised Census
2000 plan. Dr. Prewitt said such a requirement would "significantly
delay data processing operations and potentially introduce significant
errors into the data" by delaying the start of follow-up visits to
unresponsive households by six weeks.
Rep. Miller introduced H.R. 928 on March 2 but did not hold a
hearing on it. The subcommittee approved the bill on March 11.
4. "2000 Census Language Barrier Removal Act" (H.R. 929): H.R. 929
requires the Census Bureau to print and make available questionnaires in
33 languages (other than English) specified in the bill and in Braille.
The Bureau's Census 2000 plan includes questionnaires in English,
Spanish, Chinese,Vietnamese, Korean, and Tagalog, and language guides in
the 27 other languages mentioned in the legislation. Employees at
questionnaire assistance centers in the hardest-to-count communities
would help non-English speaking people fill out the forms.
Also introduced by Rep. Miller on March 2, H.R. 929 was approved
by the census panel on March 11 without a hearing. Dr. Prewitt told the
subcommittee before the bill was introduced that this new requirement
would force the Bureau to renegotiate many of its major contracts,
modify data processing equipment, and revise written materials with the
benefit of testing. These changes, he said, could "put the census at
risk."
5. "2000 Census Community Participation Enhancement Act" (H.R.
1009): H.R. 1009 authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to develop a
matching grant program for 2000 census education, outreach and
promotion, and partnership activities. All local and tribal governments
(including the U.S. territories) and nonprofit public and private
organizations would be eligible to apply for a grant, provided the
applicant makes available 50 percent of the grant amount in nonfederal
funds. The Census Bureau's 12 regional offices would be responsible for
administering the grant program. The bill authorizes $26 million in
fiscal year 2000 for this program.
H.R. 1009, sponsored by Rep. Miller, was introduced on March 4.
The census subcommittee approved the bill on March 11 after rejecting an
amendment offered by the panel's senior Democrat, Rep. Carolyn Maloney
(D-NY), to shift responsibility for administering the grant program to a
private foundation and to increase the amount of money available for the
grants. Rep. Maloney noted that the $26 million funding ceiling would
give each of the nation's 39,000 local governments an average grant
under $700, even before taking into account applications from
community-based organizations. At a March 2 hearing, Dr. Prewitt said
the Bureau has no grant-making experience, but he encouraged private
foundations to make grants to local communities for outreach and
promotion activities.
6. H.R. 1010 (no short title) authorizes $300 million in fiscal
year 2000 for census promotional, outreach and marketing activities. The
bill's sponsor, Rep. Miller, had originally suggested quadrupling the
advertising budget to $400 million. The Census Bureau's original plan
included $100 million for a paid advertising campaign and another $140
million for other marketing efforts. When he unveiled the revised census
plan last month to comply with the recent Supreme Court decision on the
use of sampling, Dr. Prewitt said the Bureau would expand the entire
marketing and promotion effort. The census subcommittee approved H.R.
1010 on March 11.
7. "Census in the Schools Promotion Act" (H.R. 1058): H.R. 1058
would expand the Census in the Schools program by requiring the Bureau
to send a full program packet to every school. Scholastic Inc.
developed the program, which the Census Bureau unveiled last week. The
Bureau had planned to target schools in the hardest-to-count communities
and make the materials available to all educators through the World Wide
Web. Dr. Prewitt told the census subcommittee at a March 2 hearing that
the Bureau had expanded the program's original scope to include every
school in the country, including those on American Indian reservations.
Rep. Miller introduced H.R. 1058 on March 10. The subcommittee has not
voted on the measure.
The Government Reform Committee will consider all of these bills at a
business meeting on March 17, at 10 a.m. in room 2154 Rayburn House
Office Building.
Questions about the information contained in this News Alert may be
directed to TerriAnn Lowenthal at 202/484-2270 or, by e-mail at
<terriann2k(a)aol.com>. Please direct all requests to receive News
Alerts, and all changes in address/phone/fax/e-mail, to the Census 2000
Initiative at <Census2000(a)ccmc.org> or 202/326-8700. Please feel free
to circulate this information to colleagues and other interested
individuals.
What are you talking about, and why did this come to me?
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Cook [SMTP:Charles_Cook(a)mma.org]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 1999 7:43 PM
To: Elaine.Murakami(a)fhwa.dot.gov
Cc: ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
Subject: Re: [CTPP] Where is TAZ-UP? (Originally sent 2/25, resending 3/5)
Never received the 2/25 version, but now received two of the 3/5 versions
from you.
For those who are wondering why you got email from something called
ctpp-news, Welcome. For those who know what ctpp-news is about be
warned. Last night we added the email addresses of all of the states
and mpos that are participating in the TAZ Update program to the
ctpp-news listserve. That brought out list to some 437 subscribers.
Over the next few days we will be shaking out the bad addresses,
correcting others and seeing how the list software functions.
For those who are new to all of this make sure to check out the web site
hosted by the TRB Subcommittee on Census Data for Transportation
Planning at
http://www.mcs.com/~berwyned/census/
At the site are copies of our newsletter "ctpp status report" and other
topical information.
There is also a link to a page that tells you how to post, resign or be
added to the listserve.
To post to the listserve send your message to ctpp-news(a)chrispy.net
To delete yourself from the list send me an email or do it automatically
by sending an email to majordomo(a)chrispy.net stating "unsubscribe
ctpp-news" in the body of the message. Make sure to send the email from
the address that you want to unsubscribe.
If you have any questions about this feel free to drop me an email or
just call.
Finally, if you are getting duplicate messages please let me know.
ed christopher
berwyned(a)mcs.com
202-366-0412
To CTPP contacts:
Tom Mank has taken a new job in New Hampshire and is no longer working on
CTPP. We will have a replacement soon. In the meantime, Jerry Everett and I
(Elaine Murakami) are handling the work.
We are running a little behind on the production and distribution of TAZ-UP.
We expect that we will start shipping packages around March 12. (Both Jerry
and Elaine will be at the Boston Transportation Planning Applications
conference from March 7-11). Because the Census Bureau does not yet have a
complete set of TIGER, the shipping of TAZ-UP will flow as the delivery of the
TIGER files to us. TAZ-UP REQUIRES the use of TIGER/Line 98. However, if you
already have a shape file with your TAZs defined with another geographic BASE,
you can bring in the file as a reference to help you define the TAZ using
TIGER/Line 98.
We are trying to set up a ONE phone number for CTPP and will let you know the
number as soon as possible. ( The number is 202-366-5000 as of 3/5/99)
Thanks for your patience. Hope to see you in Boston.
Elaine
my phone is 202-366-6971
To CTPP contacts:
Tom Mank has taken a new job in New Hampshire and is no longer working on
CTPP. We will have a replacement soon. In the meantime, Jerry Everett and I
(Elaine Murakami) are handling the work.
We are running a little behind on the production and distribution of TAZ-UP.
We expect that we will start shipping packages around March 12. (Both Jerry
and Elaine will be at the Boston Transportation Planning Applications
conference from March 7-11). Because the Census Bureau does not yet have a
complete set of TIGER, the shipping of TAZ-UP will flow as the delivery of the
TIGER files to us. TAZ-UP REQUIRES the use of TIGER/Line 98. However, if you
already have a shape file with your TAZs defined with another geographic BASE,
you can bring in the file as a reference to help you define the TAZ using
TIGER/Line 98.
We are trying to set up a ONE phone number for CTPP and will let you know the
number as soon as possible. ( The number is 202-366-5000 as of 3/5/99)
Thanks for your patience. Hope to see you in Boston.
Elaine
my phone is 202-366-6971
From: Census2000 <Census2000(a)ccmc.org>
Hearing and Document Update
Because of recent changes in, or additions to, the schedule for
congressional activities relating to the census, we want to provide
stakeholders with updated information on these events. We also want to
pass along information on how to access new materials of interest to
stakeholders.
Congressional oversight hearings: The House Subcommittee on the Census
will hold a hearing this afternoon to discuss the "America Counts Today
(ACT) Initiative," a proposal by Chairman Dan Miller (R-FL) to "enhance
traditional enumeration methods." The hearing starts at 2:00 p.m. in
room 2203 Rayburn House Office Building. Census Bureau Director Kenneth
Prewitt will testify. The subcommittee will also hear from Rep. Carrie
Meek (D-FL), sponsor of the "Decennial Census Improvement Act of 1999"
(H.R. 683). The bill would allow federal agencies to disregard income
earned by temporary census enumerators in determining eligibility for
certain federal benefits.
The census subcommittee will vote on H.R. 683 at a "mark-up" scheduled
for Thursday, March 4, at 9:15 a.m. in room 311 Cannon House Office
Building.
Congressional appropriations hearings: The House Appropriations
Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, State, and The Judiciary has
rescheduled its hearing to review the Commerce Department's budget
request for Fiscal Year 2000 (FY00), which includes funding for the
Census Bureau. Secretary William Daley will appear before the panel,
chaired by Rep. Harold Rogers (R-KY), on Wednesday, March 3, at 2:00
p.m. in room 2359 Rayburn House Office Building. The hearing originally
scheduled for March 4, to review the Census Bureau's funding request in
more detail with Director Prewitt, has been postponed.
Secretary Daley is scheduled to testify before the counterpart Senate
appropriations subcommittee, chaired by Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH), on
Thursday, March 11, at 10:00 a.m. in room S-146 of The Capitol.
Census Monitoring Board: The eight-member Census Monitoring Board will
hold a meeting on Monday, March 8, at 9:30 a.m., in the Census Bureau's
conference center at its Suitland, MD, headquarters. The agenda for the
meeting and any witnesses have not yet been announced.
Tabulating race and ethnic data: The Office of Management and Budget's
Draft Provisional Guidance on the Implementation of the 1997 Standards
for the Collection of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity can now be
found on OMB's web site at
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OMB/html/misc-doc.html>. OMB is
accepting comments on the draft guidelines for tabulating multiple
responses to the race question in the census and other federal surveys
for two months and expects to issue provisional guidance at the end of
April.
Dress rehearsal evaluation: The Census Bureau has issued a "Report Card:
Evaluation of the Standards for Success" on its Census 2000 Dress
Rehearsal, conducted in three sites in 1998. The report compares data
from various stages of dress rehearsal operations with a set of
standards for each site: Columbia, S.C. and surrounding counties;
Sacramento, CA; and Menominee County, WI (including the Menominee
American Indian Reservation). Key elements for evaluation include the
address lists, mailing a replacement questionnaire to all households,
the paid advertising campaign, door-to-door follow-up activities, and
unduplication of multiple responses from the same household. For more
information on the dress rehearsal February 1999 Report Card, please
contact the Bureau's Planning, Research, and Evaluation Division at
301/457-3525.
Questions about the information contained in this News Alert may be
directed to TerriAnn Lowenthal at 202/484-2270 or, by e-mail at
<terriann2k(a)aol.com>. Please direct all requests to receive News
Alerts, and all changes in address/phone/fax/e-mail, to the Census 2000
Initiative at <Census2000(a)ccmc.org> or 202/326-8700. Please feel free
to circulate this information to colleagues and other interested
individuals.
********** C E N S U S 2 0 0 0 B U L L E T I N **********
Vol. 3 - No. 4 Feb. 25, 1999
The following statement on Census 2000 was read by Census Bureau
Director Kenneth Prewitt at a news conference Wednesday (Feb. 24, 1999)
at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.:
"I will make a few general observations and then take your questions.
"I start with a word on recent history. The results of the 1990 census
did not please the Census Bureau, or the Bush Administration, or the
Congress, or governors, mayors, and other state and local officials, or
a large number of private and public sector data users, or the American
public. It was a costly census; it was less accurate than what the
country has a right to expect. The Census Bureau was charged to design a
more modern census, one that would reduce the number of Americans who
are missed -- either because we cannot find them or because they won't
cooperate. It did so. That design, however, quickly became mired in
political disputes, was litigated, and a month ago was set aside by the
Supreme Court.
"The Census Bureau had, of course, planned for that possibility. It had
presented an alternative design to the Administration and the Congress
in mid-January, before the Court ruling. Based on our recently completed
evaluation of our Dress Rehearsal experience, we have further refined
that plan. Its principal features are the subject of this press
conference.
"The Dress Rehearsal tells us two things.
"First, however hard we try and whatever the level of resources
available, Census 2000 will not count everyone. Moreover, this
'undercount' will not be equally distributed across demographic groups.
There is what we refer to as a differential undercount. For instance, in
1990 we counted nearly all white Americans, but only approximately 95
percent of African-Americans and Hispanics, and an even lower rate of
Native American Indians. Insofar as these less well counted groups are
concentrated in some states, not others; in some cities, not others; in
some neighborhoods, not others -- these states, cities, neighborhoods do
not get their fair share of either the political or economic benefits
allocated on the basis of census numbers.
"Second, the Census Bureau's design should include a procedure --
described in the updated summary as the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation
(ACE) -- that will identify the magnitude and distribution of the
differential account, and correct for it. The Dress Rehearsal confirms
the statistical soundness of this procedure. Consequently, I have today
informed the Secretary of Commerce and the Congress that it is feasible
for Census 2000 to include this procedure, and that by doing so we will
produce a more accurate and complete census than would otherwise be the
case.
"Because the Supreme Court ruled that this more accurate number is not
to be used for apportionment purposes, our design also includes a major,
labor intensive (and expensive) effort to find and enumerate as many
Americans as is humanly possible in the time-frame available. In pursuit
of this goal, our first and most important effort is to put a census
form in the hands of every single household in America. Census 2000
features many improvements and technical innovations not available in
1990 -- for example, a completely re-engineered Master Address File, the
most comprehensive ever constructed in U.S. history; first-ever use of
paid advertising; intensified partnerships with tens of thousands of
local governments, tribal organizations, private groups and non-profit
organizations nationally and locally, a census-in-the-schools
initiative.
"This plan is operationally robust, and will be conducted with complete
dedication by the Census Bureau professionals. This said, the
apportionment counts are not likely to be an improvement on the 1990
accuracy levels. How can this be? How can you spend more money, mount
improved operations, and yet not increase accuracy? Because all the
factors that made it difficult to count Americans in prior censuses are
today even more present. In more American families, both parents work,
making it difficult to find anyone at home. Transient lifestyles are on
the rise. People are busy. More people live in irregular housing.
Greater numbers of people are linguistically isolated. Large immigrant
populations avoid government officials. Census forms must compete with
huge flows of junk mail. More persons are cynical about -- or actively
hostile to -- any of the works of government. Census 2000 must overcome
decreased levels of civic engagement by the American people. In short,
the Census Bureau has to work harder to stay in place. We will produce
the best apportionment counts that we can; they will not include
everyone.
"Allow me to summarize the points just covered, so as to leave no
ambiguity. Between the 1st of April and 31st of December, the Census
Bureau will count (and assign to an address) everyone it possibly can.
The results of this effort will meet our obligation to present
apportionment counts without the use of modern statistical methods. But
the work will not then be finished. Census 2000 will continue its work
with an Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation in order to produce more
complete and accurate numbers, which will be ready prior to April 1,
2001. It is the task of the Census Bureau top produce the best numbers
possible, not to decide how they will be used. The more complete census
counts will be made available in a form that allows them to be used, if
it is so decided, for redistricting purposes, for determining the
allocation of federal funds, and for ongoing statistical and program
purposes. Some may describe this as a 'two-number census,' but it in
fact is a census that is progressively more complete, more accurate.
"I conclude by reminding us all that the census clock ticks --
relentlessly, ceaselessly. In just 372 days the first Census 2000 forms
get delivered. Given the lateness of the hour, we must acknowledge the
hard reality that we no longer have the luxury of debates about
alternative designs, or substitute procedures. No matter how well
intentioned, we cannot now take a chance on untested operations or late
additions. The largest peacetime mobilization in U.S. history must go
forward based on the considered professional judgment of the career
scientific and operational experts at the Census Bureau, who stand with
me here today. We are up to the task, but only if we are allowed to do
the task."
For further information about the Census 2000 Bulletins, contact J. Paul
Wyatt in the Public Information Office on 301-457-3052 (fax:
301-457-3670; e-mail: pwyatt(a)census.gov).